Simple but unsure, compound questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter vysis
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum mass of a box being pulled at a 31-degree angle with a force of 21N, while considering a static friction coefficient of 0.55. The correct approach involves analyzing both horizontal and vertical components of the forces acting on the box. The participant initially miscalculated the mass by only considering the horizontal component, leading to an incorrect answer. The correct mass calculation, taking both components into account, yields a minimum mass of 4.4 kg, as confirmed by the textbook.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static friction and its coefficient
  • Knowledge of force decomposition into horizontal and vertical components
  • Familiarity with Newton's second law of motion (F=ma)
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static and kinetic friction in physics
  • Learn about force decomposition techniques in vector analysis
  • Explore Newton's laws of motion and their applications in real-world scenarios
  • Practice solving problems involving inclined planes and forces
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of forces and motion in practical applications.

vysis
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
A boy is pulling on a box at a 31 degree angle using 21N of force. The box remains stationary. The co-efficient of static friction is 0.55. What is the minimum mass?

When I use the component method to solve this problem, do I need to calculate the mass for both the Horizontal and the Vertical and add them up? Or just the Horizontal?


(I ask this because when I solved for horizontal, the textbook said it was wrong. However, when I solved for both vertical and horizontal, I got the right answer)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vysis said:
A boy is pulling on a box at a 31 degree angle using 21N of force. The box remains stationary. The co-efficient of static friction is 0.55. What is the minimum mass?

When I use the component method to solve this problem, do I need to calculate the mass for both the Horizontal and the Vertical and add them up? Or just the Horizontal?


(I ask this because when I solved for horizontal, the textbook said it was wrong. However, when I solved for both vertical and horizontal, I got the right answer)
I'm not quite sure what you mean, could you post your working?
 
Basically:

givens
v(1) = 0m/s
F(t) = 21N (31 degree)
(mu kinetic) = 0.5
(mu static) = 0.55
a = 0m/s^2


X component
Fnet=ma
F(t) - F(f) = ma
F(t) = (mu)Mg
m = F(t) / (mu)g
m= 18N / 0.55*9.8
m = 3.3kg


Y Component

F(net) = ma
F(t) = Fg
F(t) = m/g
m = 21Sin31 / 9.8
m = 1.1kg

the answer from the textbook is 4.4kg
 
Here's your error:
vysis said:
X component
Fnet=ma
F(t) - F(f) = ma
F(t) = (mu)Mg
m = F(t) / (mu)g
m= 18N / 0.55*9.8
m = 3.3kg
What is the equation for the maximal static frictional force?
 
Hootenanny said:
Here's your error:

What is the equation for the maximal static frictional force?

isn't the equation (mu)mg? mu = F/N right? So therefore F=(mu)N -> F = (mu)mg?
 
vysis said:
mu = F/N right?
This is correct.
vysis said:
So therefore F=(mu)N -> F = (mu)mg?
But this isn't. The normal force isn't necessarily equal to the weight of the object. This is only case on a horizontal surface when the only two forces acting in the vertical plane is the object's weight and the normal force.

You should start by examining the forces acting in the vertical plane.
 
Hootenanny said:
This is correct.

But this isn't. The normal force isn't necessarily equal to the weight of the object. This is only case on a horizontal surface when the only two forces acting in the vertical plane is the object's weight and the normal force.

You should start by examining the forces acting in the vertical plane.

omg, how did I miss that 0_0

thank you, everything is 100% clear now =P
 
vysis said:
omg, how did I miss that 0_0

thank you, everything is 100% clear now =P
A pleasure :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K