Simple conceptual question about Ohm's law

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of potential difference in electrical circuits, specifically addressing the relationship between current and voltage as defined by Ohm's Law (V=IR). Participants clarify that while the current (I) remains constant across points A and B, the potential difference arises from the electric field created by the battery, which influences the potential energy of charges. The analogy of a river is used to illustrate how the same amount of water (current) can exist at different heights (voltage), emphasizing that potential energy, not charge quantity, dictates voltage differences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ohm's Law (V=IR)
  • Basic knowledge of electric fields and potential energy
  • Familiarity with the concept of current (I=Q/t)
  • Knowledge of drift velocity in conductive materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between electric fields and current in Ohmic materials
  • Explore the concept of drift velocity and its implications in electrical circuits
  • Investigate the role of resistors in energy dissipation within circuits
  • Learn about the principles of electric potential energy and its calculation
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electrical circuits and the principles governing current and voltage.

engineeringstudnt
Messages
15
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
V=IR I=Q/t
IMG20211201185512.jpg

Hİ :) as you know potential difference in point A to B is equal to the battery's voltage and point A's current is equal to point B's current.So current is I=Q/t , there should be equal charge passing through at same time so how could there be potential difference when there is equal amount of electron on each side ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
engineeringstudnt said:
Homework Statement:: .
Relevant Equations:: V=IR I=Q/t

View attachment 293404
Hİ :) as you know potential difference in point A to B is equal to the battery's voltage and point A's current is equal to point B's current.So current is I=Q/t , there should be equal charge passing through at same time so how could there be potential difference when there is equal amount of electron on each side ?
Are you asking how a battery works?
 
PeroK said:
Are you asking how a battery works?
no i know how battery's works :) . Terminals create potential difference so that charge flows on wire. my question is: point A and point B has same amount of electrons in time=t let's say(because the current is same).But why there is a potential difference in theese points :)
 
engineeringstudnt said:
But why there is a potential difference in theese points :)
I thought that was because of the battery! Take the battery away and you have a neutral wire.
 
PeroK said:
I thought that was because of the battery! Take the battery away and you have a neutral wire.
lets say we stopped to time for a while. in point A we should saw x electrons and point B we again saw x electrons(because the current are same I=Q/T) . x-x=0 but there should be a potentail difference right ? that is point what i don't understand
 
engineeringstudnt said:
lets say we stopped to time for a while. in point A we should saw x electrons and point B we again saw x electrons(because the current are same I=Q/T) . x-x=0 but there should be a potentail difference right ? that is point what i don't understand
The battery creates an electric field, which produces the current.
 
engineeringstudnt said:
lets say we stopped to time for a while. in point A we should saw x electrons and point B we again saw x electrons(because the current are same I=Q/T) . x-x=0 but there should be a potentail difference right ? that is point what i don't understand
The voltage across the resistor isn't related to the relative amounts of charge passing through either terminal of the resistor (which, as you note, are the same), but rather the relative potential energies (per unit charge) of the charges at either terminal of the resistor.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: engineeringstudnt and PeroK
ergospherical said:
The voltage across the resistor isn't related to the relative amounts of charge passing through either terminal of the resistor (which, as you note, are the same), but rather the relative potential energies (per unit charge) of the charges at either terminal of the resistor.
thanks for you answer but honestly i still didnt quite get it i guess i should read more :)
 
engineeringstudnt said:
thanks for you answer but honestly i still didnt quite get it i guess i should read more :)
Did you know that Werner Heisenberg nearly failed his PhD examination because he didn't know how a battery works?

I suspect that this, therefore, is probably not true:

engineeringstudnt said:
no i know how battery's works :) .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #10
engineeringstudnt said:
thanks for you answer but honestly i still didnt quite get it i guess i should read more :)
In an Ohmic material of length ##d## and resistance ##R##, there is an electric field given by ##E = IR/d## (this comes from a more fundamental relationship ##j = \sigma E##). As the charges flow through the resistor, the electric field does an amount ##Ed = IR## of work on them. Equivalently, it can be said that the electric potential energy (per unit charge) of the charges decreases by ##IR##. This energy is ultimately transferred to the ions in the metal, becoming heat.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: engineeringstudnt
  • #11
engineeringstudnt said:
Hİ :) as you know potential difference in point A to B is equal to the battery's voltage and point A's current is equal to point B's current.So current is I=Q/t , there should be equal charge passing through at same time so how could there be potential difference when there is equal amount of electron on each side ?
Think of a river flowing downhill. Look at a higher point and at a lower point on the river. There is the same amount of water flowing at both points, but the water has a higher potential energy at the higher point than at the lower point. The amount of water flowing is analogous to the current, and the height of the water is analogous to the voltage.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: solidarityincrimson and engineeringstudnt
  • #12
phyzguy said:
Think of a river flowing downhill. Look at a higher point and at a lower point on the river. There is the same amount of water flowing at both points, but the water has a higher potential energy at the higher point than at the lower point. The amount of water flowing is analogous to the current, and the height of the water is analogous to the voltage.
thanks for the analogy that's actually really helped.but one question if electrons loses of some of their energy when they passed the resistance don't they lose their speed too ? so if its the case current shouldn't be same at the point A and B but they are :d.?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: solidarityincrimson
  • #13
engineeringstudnt said:
thanks for the analogy that's actually really helped.but one question if electrons loses of some of their energy when they passed the resistance don't they lose their speed too ? so if its the case current shouldn't be same at the point A and B but they are :d.?
They lose potential energy when the electric field does work on them, but it's assumed that their drift velocity (and therefore also their averaged kinetic energy) is constant. You can imagine that the "excess" kinetic energy gained due to work done by the electric field is immediately transferred away to the ions in the material.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: solidarityincrimson and engineeringstudnt
  • #14
ergospherical said:
They lose potential energy when the electric field does work on them, but it's assumed that their drift velocity (and therefore also their averaged kinetic energy) is constant. You can imagine that the "excess" kinetic energy gained due to work done by the electric field is immediately transferred away to the ions in the material.
i really appreciate that thank you very much i get it now :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and ergospherical
  • #15
engineeringstudnt said:
Homework Statement:: .
Relevant Equations:: V=IR I=Q/t

So current is I=Q/t
So just to follow up to clear up your notation going forward...

The current is the amount of charge flowing through a cross-section of the wire divided by the time it took for it to flow through that surface. In delta notation is would be I = ΔQ/Δt. In differential notation (like from differential Calculus) and using LaTeX (see the LaTeX Guide at the bottom of the Edit window):
$$ I(t) = \frac{dQ(t)}{dt}$$
 
  • #16
engineeringstudnt said:
i really appreciate that thank you very much i get it now :)
Just to be sure, if you are not solid on what "drift velocity" is you should look it up.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
688
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K