B Simple Counter-balance/Counter-weight Calculation Problem

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter rh2022
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation
AI Thread Summary
To counterbalance a pole stand with a hanging object, the torque problem can be simplified by mapping all mass onto a horizontal plane and treating the pole frame as rigid. The discussion highlights two cases for counterweights: Case #1 with equal weights A and B totaling 20 kg, and Case #2 with a single counterweight C of 20 kg. If the pole frame has mass, the stability of both cases is questioned, particularly regarding the ability to allow a 20 kg object to rotate 360 degrees without flipping. It is suggested to draw a plan view to identify centers of mass and fulcrum lines to calculate total torque for various angles. Case #2 is expected to fail at a lower angle compared to Case #1, which may provide more secure support.
rh2022
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hi, I am trying to figure out how much weight is needed to counter balance a pole stand where an object(m kg) is hanging. I also want to know which is more effective way to place counterweight as shown in the picture below. I was wondering if the counterweight A, B, and C are equal.

It seems to be a simple torque problem, but I am a bit confused as the pole is not a straight line.
Any help would be appreciated.

counterweight-problem.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
It is a simple torque problem.
Map all the mass onto the horizontal plane.
Assume the pole frame is rigid and has no mass.
Assume the diagonal line is the fulcrum = hinge line.
Case #1: A = B = 10 kg. A + B = 20 kg.
Case #2: C = 20 kg.
 
Thank you for your reply.
I have an additional question.

What if the pole frame has mass: pole frame = 50kg, pole arm = 30kg, base frame = 20kg, base legs = 20kg each. Does it make difference?
I want the green object X(20kg) rotate/swing 360 degree around the Pole Frame without flipping it.
Do you think both Case #1 and Case #2 should provide stable support if I place a 20kg+ counter weight at the end base leg frame?
counterweight-problem_2.jpg
 
rh2022 said:
I want the green object X(20kg) rotate/swing 360 degree around the Pole Frame without flipping it.
You must draw the plan view, then mark all the centres of mass.
Identify the possible fulcrum line for each situation.
From that you can work out the total torque for different rotation angles.
You are considering only the static balance, do not spin it rapidly.
Note that when it starts to overbalance it will accelerate rapidly.

I expect case #2 will fail at some angle well before 135°.
Case #1 may be more secure, but you must do the numbers.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top