B Simple Counter-balance/Counter-weight Calculation Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter rh2022
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation
Click For Summary
To counterbalance a pole stand with a hanging object, the torque problem can be simplified by mapping all mass onto a horizontal plane and treating the pole frame as rigid. The discussion highlights two cases for counterweights: Case #1 with equal weights A and B totaling 20 kg, and Case #2 with a single counterweight C of 20 kg. If the pole frame has mass, the stability of both cases is questioned, particularly regarding the ability to allow a 20 kg object to rotate 360 degrees without flipping. It is suggested to draw a plan view to identify centers of mass and fulcrum lines to calculate total torque for various angles. Case #2 is expected to fail at a lower angle compared to Case #1, which may provide more secure support.
rh2022
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hi, I am trying to figure out how much weight is needed to counter balance a pole stand where an object(m kg) is hanging. I also want to know which is more effective way to place counterweight as shown in the picture below. I was wondering if the counterweight A, B, and C are equal.

It seems to be a simple torque problem, but I am a bit confused as the pole is not a straight line.
Any help would be appreciated.

counterweight-problem.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
It is a simple torque problem.
Map all the mass onto the horizontal plane.
Assume the pole frame is rigid and has no mass.
Assume the diagonal line is the fulcrum = hinge line.
Case #1: A = B = 10 kg. A + B = 20 kg.
Case #2: C = 20 kg.
 
Thank you for your reply.
I have an additional question.

What if the pole frame has mass: pole frame = 50kg, pole arm = 30kg, base frame = 20kg, base legs = 20kg each. Does it make difference?
I want the green object X(20kg) rotate/swing 360 degree around the Pole Frame without flipping it.
Do you think both Case #1 and Case #2 should provide stable support if I place a 20kg+ counter weight at the end base leg frame?
counterweight-problem_2.jpg
 
rh2022 said:
I want the green object X(20kg) rotate/swing 360 degree around the Pole Frame without flipping it.
You must draw the plan view, then mark all the centres of mass.
Identify the possible fulcrum line for each situation.
From that you can work out the total torque for different rotation angles.
You are considering only the static balance, do not spin it rapidly.
Note that when it starts to overbalance it will accelerate rapidly.

I expect case #2 will fail at some angle well before 135°.
Case #1 may be more secure, but you must do the numbers.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
365
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K