Simple finding linear acceleration

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating linear acceleration in a lab experiment involving a cart and a free-falling mass. The participant is confused about the differing results from two equations used to find acceleration, specifically questioning the use of final velocity. It is clarified that using average velocity is inappropriate in this context since the cart experiences constant acceleration, leading to discrepancies in calculated values. The correct approach involves recognizing that the final velocity cannot be simply derived from distance divided by time, as this yields only half the final velocity. The key takeaway is that the first equation should be used to accurately determine acceleration.
mistermill
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In our lab, we times a cart going 1m. The time was 9.49 s. The cart was pulled by a string, over a pulley, attached to a free-falling mass. The purpose was to calculate the μ, the coefficient of friction.

Homework Equations



d = vit + 1/2at^{2}

a = (vf-vi)/t

vi = 0 m/s
d = 1.0 m
t = 9.49 s

The Attempt at a Solution



Why does the acceleration come out differently in these two equations?

Is it that the vf is not simply 1m/9.49 seconds?
Is vf = 1/9.49 = 0.11 ?

Because that is the average velocity, and we don't use average velocity because we have a constant acceleration?

In the first equation I get a = 0.02m/s^{2}
and in the second equation I get a = 0.01 m/s^{2}

I think I know why, but I would like someone to say,"yes that is why you must use the first equation."
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
V_{f}=9.8t

It's invalid to say V_{f}=\frac{d}{t} because, as you said, that is the average velocity (which is less than the final velocity)
Since initial velocity is zero, the expression \frac{d}{t} will only give you half the final velocity. That is why your two accelerations were different by a factor of 2.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K