Simple Harmonic Motion - Acceleration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the maximum acceleration of a hydrogen atom in simple harmonic motion, using the formula for frequency, f = 1 / 2π * √(k/m), where k is approximately 560 N/m and m is the mass of a proton (1.7 x 10-27 kg). Participants confirm that the maximum force can be calculated using F = kx, where x is the maximum displacement, and that the maximum acceleration can also be derived using a = -ω2x. Both methods are valid and yield equivalent results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion principles
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of oscillation frequency calculations
  • Basic proficiency in algebra for rearranging equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the simple harmonic motion equations
  • Learn about calculating maximum acceleration in oscillatory systems
  • Explore the relationship between force, displacement, and acceleration in harmonic motion
  • Investigate the implications of mass and spring constant on oscillation frequency
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and oscillatory motion, as well as anyone involved in advanced studies of atomic interactions and forces.

Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Hi, :smile:

Assuming that the motion of the hydrogen atom is simple harmonic, its frequency of oscillation, f, is given by the expression:

f = 1 / 2π * √(k/m)​

where k is the force per unit displacement between a hydrogen atom and the carbon atom and the m is the mass of a proton.

(i) Show that the value of k is approximately 560 N/m
(From previous parts of this question I knew: f = 9.1 x 1013 Hz and the mass was 1.7 x 10-27

I managed to do this question by rearranging and plugging the numbers in the formula

However, I am having problems with part (ii)

(ii) Estimate, using your answers to (c)(i), the maximum acceleration of the hydrogen atom.

I am thinking either F = ma, where F = kx. In this case, the k I got from the previous question would be the constant k, or the F itself?

Or use a = -ω2x, using the maximum displacement (I have it from previous part of the question)

How should I approach the second part with the F = ma format? Is it possible to tackle the problem in those two ways?

Thanks,
Peter G.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter G. said:
I am thinking either F = ma, where F = kx. In this case, the k I got from the previous question would be the constant k, or the F itself?
That method would work, but I don't understand the question. (Of course the k will be the constant k.)

Or use a = -ω2x, using the maximum displacement (I have it from previous part of the question)
That works.

How should I approach the second part with the F = ma format? Is it possible to tackle the problem in those two ways?
What's the maximum force?
 
The maximum force would be the constant multiplied by the maximum displacement?
 
Peter G. said:
The maximum force would be the constant multiplied by the maximum displacement?
Exactly. Now you can use Newton's 2nd law to calculate the maximum acceleration.

(Be sure to solve it both ways--convince yourself that the methods are equivalent.)
 
Ok, will do!

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K