Simple Harmonic Motion- From Uniform Circular Motion

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between angular frequency (W), frequency (f), and the period (T) in simple harmonic motion. The confusion arises from the different forms of the equations provided by the instructor and the textbook. It is clarified that W can be expressed as W = 2π√(k/m), where k is the spring constant and m is the mass, while T can be derived as T = 2π√(m/k). The distinction between measuring frequency in radians per second versus Hertz is also explained, noting that 1 Hz equals one cycle per second, which corresponds to 2π radians. Understanding these conversions helps clarify the equations and their applications in simple harmonic motion.
chantalprince
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I don't have a homework question exactly, but I need help with an equation please.


Angular frequency: W= 2 pi/T = 2(pi)(f) f= frequency

And- W = square root of (k/m) k = spring constant m= mass

So, wouldn't T = 2 pi / square root of (k/m) ??



My instructor has given us the following equations in class a few times. I cannot figure out what the heck is going on!

W = (2 pi) x the square root of(k/m)
T = (2 pi) x the square root of (m/k) -------> m/k this time

Any help is appreciated. I am so confused right now.





Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is simply because of the fact that:

\frac{1}{\frac{a}{b}}=\frac{b}{a}
 
Ok- but in the book it gives: W = sq. root of (k/m)

Instructor gives: W = 2pi x sq. root (k/m)

Whats with the 2 pi??

Thanks-
 
What's the difference between measuring angular frequency in Hz and measuring frequency in radians per second? That might give you an idea where the conversion comes from.
 
Ok...I'll sit down with that thought. So, either one works right? They are the same thing??
 
Ah I see what you're getting at now. There's a mistake in the equation for frequency:

\omega_{n} = \sqrt{\frac {k}{m}} (1)

where frequency is in radians per second.

But what if you want to express the frequency in Hertz? Well, we know that 1 Hz is equal to one cycle per second. In the case of circular motion, one cycle is equal to 2\pi radians.

So to convert from radians per second to Hertz, one must divide by 2\pi. Hence:

\omega = \frac {1}{2\pi} \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} (2)

where frequency is now in Hertz.

Now let's express this in terms of the period of one cycle, T. Bear in mind that if you were simply to reciprocate the expression for frequency when expressed in radians per second (equation 1), you would be stating the length of time of rotation for one radian alone. Hence you have to multiply the expression by 2\pi now to obtain the period for a single cycle. This is now the same equation as you would obtain by reciprocating equation 2.

Hope this helps.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K