Simple Harmonic Motion: Giancoli Problem Help

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a simple harmonic motion problem involving a 1.15-kg mass oscillating with the equation x = 0.650cos(8.40t). Key points include determining the amplitude (0.650 m), frequency (approximately 1.32 Hz), and total energy of the system, which should be calculated without considering gravitational potential energy since the motion is horizontal. Participants clarify that total energy can be calculated at any position, emphasizing that energy conservation applies throughout the oscillation. The confusion about using k = mg/x is addressed, as it only applies to vertical systems, reinforcing that the problem describes a horizontal mass-spring system.
hstone
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 1.15-kg mass oscillates according to the equation x = .650cos(8.40t) where x is in meters and t in seconds. Determine a)the amplitude, b)the frequency, c) the total energy of the system, and d) the kinetic and potential energy when x = 0.360m.

Homework Equations



x = Acosωt
ω = 2πf
Etotal = KE + PEs +PEg = 1/2mv² + 1/2kx² + mgy
v = rω
∑F = ma
F = kx

The Attempt at a Solution



a) Amplitude is given in the problem. A = .650m
b) Frequency f = ω/2π = 8.40/2π = 13.2 Hz
c) Total Energy E = 1/2mv² + 1/2kx² + mgy

This is where I am having difficulty, and feel like I am taking a complicated route and overlooking a simple solution. I assume there is no gravitational potential energy, since the problem doesn't mention any change in height. Simplifying and manipulating the equation for total energy I get the following:

E = 1/2m(Aω)² + 1/2(mg/x)(x²) = 1/2m[(Aω)² + gx]
E = 1/2(1.15)[(8.40*0.650)² + 9.8*0.360] = 19.2 J

I don't think this is correct, since I'm pretty sure I'm not supposed to use x = 0.360 in the equation. If I use the equation given in the problem I'd need to know t. I don't think this is the right way of going about this problem. I know I am not thinking about this correctly, and all of the possible equations and different forms are muddling my thought process.

Can I just calculate the total energy at ANY position to make this simpler? If so, I would use the equilibrium position x = 0, and my equation would be E = 1/2m(Aω)² = 17.14 J.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hstone said:

Homework Statement



A 1.15-kg mass oscillates according to the equation x = .650cos(8.40t) where x is in meters and t in seconds. Determine a)the amplitude, b)the frequency, c) the total energy of the system, and d) the kinetic and potential energy when x = 0.360m.

Homework Equations



x = Acosωt
ω = 2πf
Etotal = KE + PEs +PEg = 1/2mv² + 1/2kx² + mgy
v = rω
∑F = ma
F = kx

The Attempt at a Solution



a) Amplitude is given in the problem. A = .650m
b) Frequency f = ω/2π = 8.40/2π = 13.2 Hz
Did you mean 1.32 Hz? Since ##2\pi## is greater than 1, numerically ##f## should be less than 8.40.

c) Total Energy E = 1/2mv² + 1/2kx² + mgy

This is where I am having difficulty, and feel like I am taking a complicated route and overlooking a simple solution. I assume there is no gravitational potential energy, since the problem doesn't mention any change in height.
That's right. The only potential energy in this problem is the spring's.

Simplifying and manipulating the equation for total energy I get the following:

E = 1/2m(Aω)² + 1/2(mg/x)(x²) = 1/2m[(Aω)² + gx]
E = 1/2(1.15)[(8.40*0.650)² + 9.8*0.360] = 19.2 J

I don't think this is correct, since I'm pretty sure I'm not supposed to use x = 0.360 in the equation. If I use the equation given in the problem I'd need to know t. I don't think this is the right way of going about this problem. I know I am not thinking about this correctly, and all of the possible equations and different forms are muddling my thought process.

Can I just calculate the total energy at ANY position to make this simpler? If so, I would use the equilibrium position x = 0, and my equation would be E = 1/2m(Aω)² = 17.14 J.
Yes, you can. Energy is conserved, so if you calculate the total energy at anyone place in the cycle, you know the total energy throughout the cycle.

One mistake you are making is using the relation ##k = mg/x##. This applies to a mass hanging from a spring, where x is the amount the spring is stretched when the mass is in equilibrium. Since you don't have a mass hanging from a spring, you can't use that. You do have a relation that always applies to a mass-and-spring harmonic oscillator. You can use it to solve for ##k##.
 
When the spring force is the only force acting on the mass doesn't k = mg/x apply, since ΣF=kx=ma and the only acceleration is due to gravity? Should I be using ω=√(k/m), instead?

There are so many relations, I'm having difficulty keeping them all straight. I think I probably need to derive them all to be sure of where they are coming from.

Thanks so much for your help! It's greatly appreciated.
 
hstone said:
When the spring force is the only force acting on the mass doesn't k = mg/x apply, since ΣF=kx=ma and the only acceleration is due to gravity?
What are the forces on the mass? I'm assuming the problem is referring to a spring-mass system that moves horizontally. Is that right?

Should I be using ω=√(k/m), instead?
That'll work.

There are so many relations, I'm having difficulty keeping them all straight. I think I probably need to derive them all to be sure of where they are coming from.

Thanks so much for your help! It's greatly appreciated.
Deriving equations is good. It definitely helps you know when you can or can't use a particular equation.
 
The problem just states that 'a mass oscillates.' It's pretty vague. I can see now why k=mg/x wouldn't work, since k is constant and shouldn't change with x.

Thanks!
 
##k=mg/x## applies to a mass hanging from a weight, and it only holds as the position where the force exerted by the spring, kx, equals in magnitude the weight of the mass, mg. In other words, it holds for a specific value of ##x##.

I think it's safe to assume that you just have the archetypical harmonic oscillator, a mass connected to a spring and moving on a frictionless horizontal surface. Since the motion is horizontal, gravity doesn't play a role, which is another reason mg=kx wouldn't apply.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
807
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
839
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K