Simple Harmonic Motion-oscillation on an ideal spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter MissEuropa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic Spring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in simple harmonic motion involving a mass oscillating on an ideal spring. The original poster presents a scenario where a mass of 0.870 kg oscillates with a frequency of 1.33 Hz, and they seek to determine the new frequency when additional or reduced mass is applied, without calculating the spring constant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find a relationship between frequency and mass without using the spring constant. They express confusion about how to proceed with the problem as stated.
  • Some participants suggest that the original poster's method may inadvertently involve the spring constant, prompting a reevaluation of their approach.
  • Others propose using relationships between angular frequency and mass to explore the problem further, indicating that the spring constant could cancel out in their equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and alternative approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationships between frequency, mass, and angular frequency, which may help the original poster in their exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is constrained by the requirement to solve the problem without determining the spring constant, which has led to questions about the validity of their initial approach.

MissEuropa
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When a 0.870kg mass oscillates on an ideal spring, the frequency is 1.33Hz.
a) What will the frequency be if 0.290kg are added to the original mass? Try to solve this problem without finding the force constant of the spring.

b) What will the frequency be if 0.290kg are subtracted from the original mass? Try to solve this problem without finding the force constant of the spring.

Homework Equations


f=(1/T) or1/2π*√k/m

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm at a loss as to how to approach this without using the spring constant k.
My attempt at a solution so far anyway:
frequency= c/m where c is a constant and m is the mass.
Solving for c in the equation 1.33 Hz=c/0.870kg I found c= 1.151
Then I divided c (1.151) by the original mass plus the added mass.
1.151/(0.870kg + 0.290kg) = .992

But this is incorrect, I want to attempt to do the prompt as instructed without using k but I'm at a loss currently. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your method was indirectly solving for k hidden inside of that constant you chose.

You can multiply the new mass into the equation
\omega_1=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m_1}}
to get
\omega_1 \sqrt{m_2}=\sqrt{k\frac{m_2}{m_1}}
and you can subsitute in the solution for m2 from the equation
\omega_2=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m_2}}
solved for m2
\sqrt{m_2}=\frac{\sqrt{k}}{\omega_2}

That should lead you on your way, the k's will fall out of the equation.

Oh and just in case the notation I used is new..
\omega=2\pi f
 
Last edited:
You are on the right track but f = c/√M
Use this to find c then substitue the new masses
 
Alucinor said:
I think your method was indirectly solving for k hidden inside of that constant you chose.

You can multiply the new mass into the equation
\omega_1=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m_1}}
to get
\omega_1 \sqrt{m_2}=\sqrt{k\frac{m_2}{m_1}}
and you can subsitute in the solution for m2 from the equation
\omega_2=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m_2}}
solved for m2
\sqrt{m_2}=\frac{\sqrt{k}}{\omega_2}

That should lead you on your way, the k's will fall out of the equation.

Oh and just in case the notation I used is new..
\omega=2\pi f

Awesome, that did help a lot. I think I was not going down that route because I didn't consider that the k's would cancel out.
:-) Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
895
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K