Simple Harmonic Motion (Total Energy)

[KiNGGeexD]

I have a question about the derivation that I have attached! I understand that both KE and U are 1/2 kA^2 So how is it that the two combine is also equal to 1/2kA^2Not sure if I'm missing something but I'm a little confused :(

 

[HallsofIvy]

Part of the problem is that what you "understand" is not true. It is NOT the case that "both KE and U are 1/2 kA^2". What is true is that E= 1/2 kA^2 sin^2(\omega t+ \phi) and U= 1/2 kA^2 cos^2(\omega t+ \phi).

Adding those gives KE+ U= 1/2 kA^2(sin^2(\theta)+ cos^2(\theta)). Now use the fact that sin^2(\theta)+ cos^2(\theta)= 1 for all \theta!

 

[KiNGGeexD]

So that leaves

1/2mv^2 + 1/2kA^2?

 

[Tanya Sharma]

[
I have a question about the derivation that I have attached! I understand that both KE and U are 1/2 kA^2 So how is it that the two combine is also equal to 1/2kA^2Not sure if I'm missing something but I'm a little confused :(

KE = (1/2)mv² and v= ωAcos(ωt+ø)
So ,KE = (1/2)mω²A²cos²(ωt+ø)

But ,k = mω²

Hence KE = (1/2)kA²cos²(ωt+ø) (1)

PE = (1/2)kx² and x= Asin(ωt+ø)
So ,PE = (1/2)kA²sin²(ωt+ø) (2)

E=KE+PE

Using the fact sin²θ+cos²θ =1 ,

E=(1/2)kA²

 

[KiNGGeexD]

But there are two terms of kA^2?

I feel like I'm missing something obvious?

 

[Tanya Sharma]

But there are two terms of kA^2?

I feel like I'm missing something obvious?

E = (1/2)kA²cos²(ωt+ø) + (1/2)kA²sin²(ωt+ø)

Take (1/2)kA² common from both the terms ,

E = (1/2)kA²[cos²(ωt+ø) + sin²(ωt+ø)]

Hence E = (1/2)kA²

 

[KiNGGeexD]

Ahh so you take 1/2kA^2 out as a common factor

 

[Tanya Sharma]

Yes...just like if we have 2a+2b ,we can write it as 2(a+b) .

 

[KiNGGeexD]

I knew it would be something trivial! That's a bunch mate!