Simple Harmonic Motion using total mechanical energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass-spring system executing simple harmonic motion, where the mass is 250 grams, the period is 0.5 seconds, and the total mechanical energy is 0.50J. The original poster attempts to find the amplitude of motion using the relationship between potential energy and total mechanical energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equation relating potential energy to the spring constant and displacement, questioning how to incorporate time into their calculations. They explore various equations involving the spring constant and acceleration, and some participants suggest reviewing the form of solutions for simple harmonic motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes multiple interpretations of the equations involved and attempts to clarify the relationships between displacement, velocity, and acceleration in simple harmonic motion. Some participants offer guidance on reviewing notes and considering the form of the solution, while others express confusion about the direction of their reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need to consider sign conventions and the relationship between displacement and acceleration in the context of simple harmonic motion. The original poster mentions having an answer from an answer key but is unsure how to arrive at it.

StrawHat
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 250 gram mass is connected to a spring and executes simple harmonic motion. The period of motion is 0.5 seconds and the total mechanical energy is 0.50J. What is the amplitude of motion?

Homework Equations


ΔU = 1/2kx2

The Attempt at a Solution


I get

1/2kx2 = 0.5J,

then I get

kx2 = 1.0J

Not sure where to go from here. I do have the answer from the answer key, but I have no idea how to actually get the answer. I think I'm supposed to integrate something, but I'm not sure how to incorporate the time value into any equations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you know another equation involving k that applies to your situation?
 
kx=ma, perhaps? If so, should I use kx = m(dv/dt)? But then how will I obtain a value for velocity?
 
Last edited:
what does the solution of the differential equation kx=ma look like? [Check your notes on simple harmonic motion, watch out for sign conventions]
 
d/dt(kx)=d/dt(ma)
k(dx/dt)=m(da/dt)
kv(t)=m(da/dt)?
 
a = dv/dt = d2x/dt2 would be a better route. da/dt is going in the wrong direction.

========


the solution will be of the form x = F(t) where F will be a function that you recognise.
 
Last edited:
x=ma/k? I am totally lost...

I have ax=4. Am I on the right track?
 
what do your notes say for how x varies in a system that is executing simple harmonic motion? There is something not quite right with your kx = ma. Not quite because it is normally expressed in an ever so slightly different way.
 
F = -kx
W = Fd =∫Fnetdx
Wtotal = ΔK
ΔU = 1/2kx2
 
  • #10
If y = sin(t) what is dy/dt, what about d2y/dt2
 
  • #11
dy/dt=cos(t), d2y/dt2=-sin(t)?

Thank you for your help thus far, but it's 4AM over here in the EST timezone, so I must go to bed. I will check back on this thread in five hours or so.
 
  • #12
so how are y and d2y/dt2 related? is there anything that you have posted so far that looks similar?
 
  • #13
m(dv/dt)=k(dx/dt)
m(dv/dt)=kv?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
901
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K