Simple Harmonic Motion with Spring

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving simple harmonic motion with a massless spring. The scenario describes a spring's behavior when a mass is attached, detailing its equilibrium position and initial conditions for motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the mass and the need to find the spring constant as a preliminary step. There is uncertainty about the correct formulation for calculating the spring constant.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the necessity of determining the spring constant before proceeding with the calculation of acceleration. Multiple interpretations of the spring constant formula are being explored, indicating an ongoing examination of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the problem statement and are questioning the assumptions related to the spring's behavior and the forces involved.

getty102
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A massless spring is hanging vertically. With no load on the spring, it has a length of 0.22 m. When a mass of 0.68 kg is hung on it, the equilibrium length is 0.75 m. At t=0, the mass (which is at the equilibrium point) is given a velocity of 4.88 m/s downward.
At t=046s, what is the acceleration of the mass? (Positive for upward acceleration, negative for downward)


Homework Equations



[itex]\Sigma[/itex]Fy=-k(yeq-y0)
[itex]\Sigma[/itex]Fy=may

The Attempt at a Solution



The only two forces acting on the mass are the Tension from the spring and weight. So
Tsm-(mg)=may
I am now stuck wondering if that was a good place to start. Is the traditional way to solve this problem to find the spring constant first?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes you should find the spring constant first as you will need it later on to get the acceleration at t= 0.46.
 
I have k=(mg)/(yeq-y0). I don't think this is right.
 
getty102 said:
I have k=(mg)/(yeq-y0). I don't think this is right.

Right, well you are given m, y0 and yeq and you know g. So you can get k.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
992
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K