Integrate (e^x +1)/(e^x -1): Tips & Hints

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swatch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
To integrate (e^x + 1)/(e^x - 1), consider breaking the integral into two parts and applying different substitutions for each. A common substitution is u = e^x, transforming the integral into a more manageable form involving partial fractions. An alternative substitution is u = e^x - 1, which simplifies the integral further. The discussion highlights that different integration methods can yield various equivalent forms of the answer. Ultimately, verifying the derivative of the solution against the original integrand ensures correctness.
Swatch
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
Hi. I am trying to integrate (e^x +1)/(e^x -1)
I have looked at this for almost an hour and don´t know how to start with it. I want to use substitution but I have to rewrite this in some way. Could anyone please give me a little hint?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Swatch, try breaking the integral into two pieces and using a different substitution on each piece. One of the pieces will immediately look easy, and the other will be easy after one line of algebra.
 
Perhaps I'm missing something but a kind of obvious substitution would be
u= ex. Then (ex+1)/(ex-1) becomes (u-1)/(u+ 1). Of course, du= exdx so dx= (1/u)du. The integral
\int \frac{e^x+1}{e^x-1}dx becomes
\int \frac{u+1}{u(u-1)}du
which can be done with partial fractions.
If you don't like partial fractions, let u= ex-1. Then du= exdx so dx= (1/u) du again but now ex+ 1= u+ 2. The integral becomes
\int\frac{u+2}{u^2}du= \int \left(u^{-1}+ 2u^{-2}\right)du.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I integrated with u=e^x and used partial fraction
to get
-ln(e^x) + 2*ln(e^x -1) +C

I differentiated this back to the beginning, so I should be right. But I got a different looking answer in my textbook.
 
If the derivative of your solution gives the integrand again, you should be OK.
It's possible to find different forms of answers when integrating, that very much depends on the method used.
 
thank you for your help
 
mathmatica says it is

-2x+xln(x)+Li(x)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K