Simple particle on slope confusion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle moving down a frictionless slope at an angle theta. The original poster is attempting to find the velocity of the particle at a specific position "l" using different methods, including constant acceleration equations and integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster describes their approach using both constant acceleration formulas and integration to derive the velocity at position "l". They express confusion over discrepancies between the results obtained from these methods.

Discussion Status

Some participants engage with the original poster's confusion, suggesting that the results may actually be consistent upon further examination. The conversation indicates a productive exploration of the problem, with participants questioning the original poster's calculations and assumptions.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions a reliance on a method from a textbook, which may imply a comparison of their approach to established solutions. There is also an indication of potential miscalculations when numerical values are applied to the derived formulas.

rmawatson
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a particle on a slope with angle theta with no friction. v(0) = 0, x(0) = 0, with coordinates i down the slope and j normal to it.

I am confused about why with the constant velocity formula I get a different answer to my attempted method.. I can't see what's wrong..I need to find the velocity at "l"
x is the top of the slope of a particle on a smooth surface, with no friction,
v(0) = 0, x(0) = 0

along i direction I am starting with:

mgsin(theta) == ma

gsin(theta) == a

using constant acceleration formula

v^2 = v0^2 + 2a0(x-x0)
v^2 = 0 + 2gsin(theta)(x-0)
v = sqrt( 2gl*sin(theta) )

My original attempt below is wrong, but I can't see why. I want to know what it doesn't work the same.

so from
gsin(theta) == a

Integrating wrt t

gsin(theta)t == v + c

Integrating wrt t again

1/2*gsin(theta)t^2 == x + ct + d

with v(0) == 0 and x(0) == 0

0 = c and d = 0

so if I now plugged in 'l' to the equation for position

1/2*gsin(theta)t^2 == l

and solve for t I get,

t = sqrt[ (2l)/(gsin(theta)) ]

so this is the time at which position == l ?

If I then plug this time into the equation for velocity,

gsin(theta)t == v

gsin(theta)*sqrt[ (2l)/(gsin(theta)) ] = v

not the same as with the constant velocity formula..
why ? what is wrong with this method

Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rmawatson said:

Homework Statement


a particle on a slope with angle theta with no friction. v(0) = 0, x(0) = 0, with coordinates i down the slope and j normal to it.

I am confused about why with the constant velocity formula I get a different answer to my attempted method.. I can't see what's wrong..I need to find the velocity at "l"
x is the top of the slope of a particle on a smooth surface, with no friction,
v(0) = 0, x(0) = 0

along i direction I am starting with:

mgsin(theta) == ma

gsin(theta) == a

using constant acceleration formula

v^2 = v0^2 + 2a0(x-x0)
v^2 = 0 + 2gsin(theta)(x-0)
v = sqrt( 2gl*sin(theta) )

My original attempt below is wrong, but I can't see why. I want to know what it doesn't work the same.

so from
gsin(theta) == a

Integrating wrt t

gsin(theta)t == v + c

Integrating wrt t again

1/2*gsin(theta)t^2 == x + ct + d

with v(0) == 0 and x(0) == 0

0 = c and d = 0

so if I now plugged in 'l' to the equation for position

1/2*gsin(theta)t^2 == l

and solve for t I get,

t = sqrt[ (2l)/(gsin(theta)) ]

so this is the time at which position == l ?

If I then plug this time into the equation for velocity,

gsin(theta)t == v

gsin(theta)*sqrt[ (2l)/(gsin(theta)) ] = v

not the same as with the constant velocity formula..
why ? what is wrong with this method

Hello rmawatson. Welcome to PF!

Those answers are the same !
 
If I plug in numbers I get a different answer for both??
 
rmawatson said:
If I plug in numbers I get a different answer for both??
Example ... ?
 
Looks like I did something wrong when I checked it. I was so sure that my formula must be wrong (as it was a different way to the book and done by me) I didn't check twice.

You are right, and with some simple rearranging it comes out the same... thank you for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K