Simple Pendulum amplitude problem

SeanGillespie
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A pendulum with a swing amplitude of 150 cm is recorded to have a period of 2.1s. Calculate after 0.3s release from the furthest amplitude position.

a) Angular velocity
b) displacement
c) Angular acceleration
d) Length of the pendulum


I've only had one lecture on circular motion and the motion of pendulums, so I'm a bit unsure of the correct steps for each calculation.


Homework Equations


[tex]\omega = \frac{2\pi}{T}[/tex]

[tex]x = A cos (\omega t)[/tex]

[tex]a = -\omega^{2}x[/tex]

[tex]T = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



a)
[tex]\omega = \frac{2\pi}{2.1} = 2.99 rad s^{-1}[/tex]

b)
[tex]x = 1.5 cos (2.99 x 0.3) = 1.5 m[/tex]

c)
[tex]a = -(2.99)^{2} x 1.5 = -13.41[/tex]

d)
[tex]l = \frac{T^{2}g}{2\pi^{2}} = 106.74 m[/tex]


I'm not convinced that I'm getting b) right, as it seems odd for the displacement after 0.3 seconds to be the same as the amplitude. This makes me believe that I'm wrong in other places.

See what's wrong? [I don't have the answers to check for myself]

Any similar problems to practice on would be welcomed; I don't want to constantly feel that I'm missing something.
 
one problem I see is that in part d) you should be dividing by 4, not 2
 
srmeier said:
one problem I see is that in part d) you should be dividing by 4, not 2

also, I do not get the same answer as you do for part b). Make sure your calculator is in radiant, not degrees.

(I am assuming the extra x in the cosine function was a typo)
 
Oh yes, I think I made a typo when I typed the post; it's 4 PI in my notes. Regardless of that I made a calculation error on that part...

I now have L = 1.1m for d).

Thanks.
 
SeanGillespie said:
Oh yes, I think I made a typo when I typed the post; it's 4 PI in my notes. Regardless of that I made a calculation error on that part...

I now have L = 1.1m for d).

Thanks.

also, check to see if your calculator is in radians. For part B)
 
Ah... thank you.

Neglected to think that I was working with radians.

b) 0.9 m
c) -8.05

I assume that I've got the right set of answers for the question now.
 
yes, your physics appears flawless.
 
I think d) is 1.1m.

I was getting 106.74 by forgetting to bracket the 4pi^2; it was dividing by 4 and then multiplying by pi^2. Don't know why, I thought that calculators multiplied before dividing.
 
SeanGillespie said:
I think d) is 1.1m.

I was getting 106.74 by forgetting to bracket the 4pi^2; it was dividing by 4 and then multiplying by pi^2. Don't know why, I thought that calculators multiplied before dividing.

details my friend, details :smile:

The physics is the important part.
 
  • #10
Thank you for your help; now I can move on and get stuck on something else. Midterm tests next week... :(
 
  • #11
SeanGillespie said:
Thank you for your help; now I can move on and get stuck on something else. Midterm tests next week... :(

Good luck my friend! may the [tex]ma[/tex] be with you :cool:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K