Simple pendulum, changing amplitude vs changing the length of string

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the effects of changing the amplitude of a simple pendulum versus changing the length of the string on the period of oscillation. Participants explore theoretical and experimental perspectives on how these changes influence the pendulum's behavior, particularly in the context of small angle approximations and simple harmonic motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why changing the amplitude does not affect the period while changing the string length does, suggesting both changes alter height and arc length.
  • Another participant clarifies that changing the string length affects the period independently of arc length, emphasizing that the period does not depend on the arc length for larger amplitudes.
  • A different viewpoint introduces the concept of simple harmonic motion, explaining that for small angles, the restoring force is proportional to the displacement, leading to a period that does not depend on amplitude.
  • Further elaboration indicates that if the angle is small, the frequency remains unaffected by amplitude, as derived from the equations of motion for small oscillations.
  • Another participant notes that if larger amplitudes are considered, the equations of motion indicate that the period does depend on amplitude, referencing a specific integral expression for the period.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between amplitude and period, particularly regarding the conditions under which amplitude affects the period. There is no consensus on whether amplitude influences the period outside of small angle approximations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumption of small oscillations for some arguments, while others reference more complex behavior for larger amplitudes. The discussion highlights the dependence on specific conditions and definitions related to the pendulum's motion.

Bengo
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I don't understand how changing the amplitude does not change the period but changing the length of the string does. Each changes the height and changes the arc length so wouldn't they both change the period?

Thank you for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Changing the length of the string only changes the arc-length if you keep the initial angle fixed.

Have you tred this out in an experiment? (Keeping the arc-length the same for different string-lengths?)
What you have noticed is that the period of the pendulum does not depend on the arc-length - therefore the mechanism by which changing the string-length changes the period does not involve the arc-length either.

For a bigger arc-length, the height dropped is bigger, so the speed at the bottom is faster, so the period remains unchanged. So you need to look more carefully at what is different for a longer pendulum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rishav Raj
A pendulum only works that way for small angles. The "buzz phrase" is simple harmonic motion.

Consider a system where the force trying to bring the object back to "zero" is proportional to the size of the displacement from zero. For example, a perfect spring with force constant K.

F = - K x

A pendulum will work that way for small angles, because the force towards zero angle will be proportional to the angle. That's some keen geometry homework. Show it's true because for small theta, sin(theta) is proportional to theta. And show what the effective spring constant K is, and so get an effective equation that looks like F = - K x.

So if F = - K x, then the second derivative w.r.t. time (the acceleration a) is proportional to x.

F = m a = - K x
so
a = (- K/m) x

And that can be solved exactly for x as a function of time. Suppose x(t=0) is D, and suppose speed at t=0 is 0. That is, we pull the thing back and let it go at t=0. Then you get x = D cos(w t), and w^2 = K/m. That's because the derivative of cos(w t) w.r.t. to time t is - w sin(w t). And the derive of that is -w^2 cos(w t).

But notice that w, the angular frequency, gives the period. The period is w/(2 pi). And note also that w only depends on K/m, not on D. That is, the amplitude does not affect the frequency.

So, for a pendulum, if the angle is small, then the frequency does not depend on the amplitude. And it's because the pendulum (approximately) satisfies an equation that looks like F = - K x.
Dan
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rishav Raj
DEvens made the key point: what you are speaking of only works for very small amplitudes so if you wanted to keep the motion simple harmonic but wanted to change the amplitude you must change it by an infinitesimal amount, thus it wouldn't affect anything regardless. If we do not assume small oscillations, the equations of motion remain as ##\ddot{\theta} + \sin\theta = 0## (I have set ##m = L = g = 1## for simplicity). Hence the period of oscillation is given by ##T = \frac{4}{\sqrt{2}}\int _{0}^{\theta_{\max}}\frac{d\theta}{\sqrt{\cos\theta - \cos\theta_{\max}}}## which does depend on the amplitude ##\theta_{max}##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
902
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K