Simple Pendulum & Elevator Homework | Period Formula for Accelerating Elevator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the period formula for a simple pendulum suspended in an accelerating elevator. The correct formula for the period T of the pendulum, considering the elevator's upward acceleration a, is T = 2π(L/(g + a))^(1/2). The participants clarify that this formula incorporates both gravitational acceleration g and the elevator's acceleration a, confirming its relevance in the context of non-inertial reference frames. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the physical equivalence of gravitational fields and acceleration as articulated by Einstein in 1907.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion and pendulum dynamics
  • Familiarity with gravitational acceleration (g) and its effects
  • Knowledge of non-inertial reference frames and their implications
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the period of a simple pendulum under varying conditions
  • Explore the implications of non-inertial frames in classical mechanics
  • Learn about the effects of acceleration on pendulum motion in different environments
  • Investigate Einstein's equivalence principle and its applications in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in the dynamics of pendulums in non-inertial reference frames.

hansel13
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A simple Pendulum is suspended from the ceiling of an elevator. The elevator is accelerating upwards with acceleration a. The period of this pendulum, in terms of its length L, g, and a is:
2\pi*(L/a)^(1/2)
OR
2\pi*(L/(g+a))^(1/2)
OR
2\pi*(L/g)^(1/2)

Homework Equations


T = 2\pi*(L/g)^(1/2)

The Attempt at a Solution


Not sure where to start. It doesn't seem like there's really math involved here. I tried drawing a free body diagram, but that made things worse. I'm pretty sure it's the middle one, because the other 2 just don't make sense, because the formula needs to both a and g into account, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Right.

"we [...] assume the complete physical equivalence of a gravitational field and a corresponding acceleration of the reference system." (Einstein 1907)
 
OK thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K