Simple Pendulum - Linear Second-Order Equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a simple pendulum, specifically focusing on the nonlinear second-order differential equation governing its motion. The original poster outlines the problem involving the derivation of the pendulum's equation of motion and its period of oscillation, starting from the initial conditions of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of expressions for the pendulum's motion, including the energy integral lemma and various transformations of variables. There is an exploration of how to express the time differential in terms of different variables and the implications of these transformations on the period of oscillation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made progress on parts of the problem, particularly in deriving expressions for the time differential and the period. However, there are ongoing questions regarding the correct application of transformations and the limits of integration for the period calculation. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being explored, and participants are providing guidance to each other on the mathematical steps involved.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the correct application of trigonometric identities and the handling of derivatives in the context of variable changes. Participants are also questioning the assumptions made about the limits of integration for the period of the pendulum.

sourlemon
Messages
52
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In section 4.7, we discussed the simple pendulum consisting of a mass m suspended by a rod of length l having negligible mass and derived the nonlinear initial value problem.

(17) \frac{d^{2}\phi}{dt^{2}} + \frac{g}{l}sin\theta=0

\theta(0) = \alpha

\theta'(0) = 0

where g is the acceleration due to gravity and \theta(t) is the angle of the rod makes with the vertical at time t. Here it is assumed that the mass is released with zero velocity at an initial angle \alpha, 0 < \alpha < \pi. We would like to determine the equation of motion for the pendulum and its period of oscillation.

(a) Use equation (17) and the energy integral lemma discussed in Section 4.7 to show that

\left(\frac{d\theta}{dt}\right)^{2} = \frac{2g}{l}(cos\theta - cos\alpha)

and hence

dt = - \sqrt{\frac{l}{2g}}\frac{d\theta}{\sqrt{cos\theta - cos\alpha}}

(b) Use the trigonometric identity cos x = 1 - 2sin^{2}(\frac{x}{2}) to express dt by

dt = - \frac{l}{2}\sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}\frac{d\theta}{\sqrt{sin^{2}(\alpha/2) - sin^{2}(\theta/2)}}

(c)Make the change of variables sin(\theta/2) = sin (\alpha/2)sin\phi to rewrite dt in the form

dt = - \sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}\frac{d\phi}{\sqrt{1 - k^{2}sin^{2}(\phi/2)}}

where k = sin(\alpha/2).

(d) The period P(\alpha) of the pendulum is defined to be the time required for the pendulum to swing from one extreme to the other and back - that is, from \alpha to -\alpha back to \alpha. Show that the period of oscillation is given by

(19) P(\alpha) = 4\sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}\int\frac{d\phi}{\sqrt{1 - k^{2}sin^{2}(\phi/2)}}

where k = sin(\alpha/2). [Hint: The period is just four times the time it takes the pendulum to go from \theta = 0 to \theta = \alpha]

The integral in (19) is called an elliptic integral of the first kind and is denoted by F(k, \pi/2. As you might expect, the period of the simple pendulum depends on the length "l" of the rod and the initial displacement \alpha. In fact, a check of an elliptic integral table will show that the period nearly doubles as the initial displacement increases from \pi/8 to 15\pi/16 (for fixed "l"). What happens as \alpha approaches \pi

Homework Equations



Lemma 3.
Let y(t) be a solution to the differential equation

(7) y" = f(y)

where f(y) is a continuous function that does not depend on y' or the independent variable t. Let F(y) be an indefinite integral of f(y), that is

f(y) = \frac{d}{dy}F(y).

Then the quantity

(8) E(t) = \frac{1}{2}y't^{2} - F(y(t))

is constant; i.e.,

(9) \frac{d}{dt}E(t) = 0.

The Attempt at a Solution



Lolz writing this problem alone takes forever. There's actually a part e, but I figure that out, so I didn't post it. As for part a and b, I got that too. I'm only having problem with part c and d.

(c)Make the change of variables sin(\theta/2) = sin (\alpha/2)sin\phi to rewrite dt in the from

dt = - \frac{l}{2}\sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}\frac{d\theta}{\sqrt{sin^{2}(\alpha/2) - sin^{2}(\theta/2)}}

to

dt = - \sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}\frac{d\phi}{\sqrt{1 - k^{2}sin^{2}(\phi/2)}}

where k = sin(\alpha/2).

I'm not sure yet how to start d, but I've start c. I think my problem is changing d\theta to d\phi.

My teacher said to take the derivative of both. So

sin(\theta/2) = sin (\alpha/2)sin\phi

becomes

1/2cos(\theta/2) = sin(\alpha/2)cos\phi

Since I'm changing d\theta to d\phi, I took the assumption that sin(\alpha/2)is a constant.

Plugging that in the equation I get

dt = - \frac{l}{2}\sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}\frac{1}{2}\frac{cos(\theta/2)}{\sqrt{sin^{2}(\alpha/2) - sin^{2}(\alpha/2)sin^{2}\phi}}

In part b, cos x = 1 - 2sin^{2}(\frac{x}{2}), so I figure I can try to do that too. So

cos(\theta/2) = 1 - 2sin^{2}(\frac{\theta}{4})

But how can I change 1 - 2sin^{2}(\frac{\theta}{4}) to something with \alpha or \phi? I can't figure out what triognometric properties I can use.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
sourlemon said:
My teacher said to take the derivative of both. So

sin(\theta/2) = sin (\alpha/2)sin\phi

1/2cos(\theta/2) = sin(\alpha/2)cos\phi
That's not right. What happened to the derivative? You should get,

<br /> \frac{1}{2} \cos{\frac{\theta}{2}} \left(\frac{d \theta}{d \phi}\right) = \sin {\frac{\alpha}{2}} \cos \phi

You need to substitute for d\theta and \sin\frac{\theta}{2}} in the equation.
 
Lolz, thank you for not running away after seeing my post. Lolz I feel so dumb. What a careless mistake. Thank you so much siddharth!

I have c solved :D now I must tackle d :(

(d) The period P(\alpha) of the pendulum is defined to be the time required for the pendulum to swing from one extreme to the other and back - that is, from \alpha to -\alpha back to \alpha. Show that the period of oscillation is given by

(19) P(\alpha) = 4\sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}\int\frac{d\phi}{\sqrt{1 - k^{2}sin^{2}(\phi/2)}}

where k = sin(\alpha/2). [Hint: The period is just four times the time it takes the pendulum to go from \theta = 0 to \theta = \alpha]

The integral in (19) is called an elliptic integral of the first kind and is denoted by F(k, \pi/2. As you might expect, the period of the simple pendulum depends on the length "l" of the rod and the initial displacement \alpha. In fact, a check of an elliptic integral table will show that the period nearly doubles as the initial displacement increases from \pi/8 to 15\pi/16 (for fixed "l"). What happens as \alpha approaches \pi?

From part c, I have the equation

dt = - \sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}\frac{d\phi}{\sqrt{1 - k^{2}sin^{2}(\phi/2)}}

where k = sin(\alpha/2).

So integrating both sides to have the period, I would have

P(\alpha) = \sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}\int\frac{d\phi}{\sqrt{1 - k^{2}sin^{2}(\phi/2)}}

Since \sqrt{\frac{l}{g}} is constant, I can move that out of the integral.

I am little confuse on how you determine that the integration is from 0 to \frac{\pi}{2}. What I figure is depending on where the pendulum is release, the most it can make is from 0 to \pi. But for a period, the pendulum needs to swing from \alpha to -\alpha back to \alpha. So would it make sense if I integrate it from 0 to \pi and multiply it by 2?...I'm a bit stuck here. I can see that if you release the pendulum from 0, it's the same as it is release from \pi, so with that, can I conclude that from 0 to \frac{\pi}{2} is the same as \frac{\pi}{2} to \pi. That's why you can say that the integral is from 0 to \frac{\pi}{2}, multiply by 4?

What happens as \alpha approaches \pi?
If the \alpha from 0 to \frac{\pi}{2}, then the period decrease. But if \alpha is from \frac{\pi}{2} to \pi, then the period increase. Is that right?
 
Last edited:
*sigh* turned out I missed a lot of things. I mistyped in the first post, it's suppose to be d\theta not d\phi.

Let's start from the beginning.

(17) \frac{d^{2}\theta}{dt^{2}} + \frac{g}{l}sin\theta=0

Rearranging the equation,
\frac{d^{2}\theta}{dt^{2}} = - \frac{g}{l}sin\theta = \theta&#039;&#039; = f(\theta)

Following the lemma energy stated above,

f(\theta) = \frac{d}{d\theta}F(\theta) = \frac{d}{d\theta}(\frac{g}{l}cos\theta + C)

E(t)= \frac{1}{2}\theta&#039;(t)^{2} - F(\theta(t))

Plugging the known data \theta(0) = \alpha and \theta&#039;(0) = 0

E(t) = \frac{1}{2}(0)^{2} - \alpha = - \alpha

E(t)= \frac{1}{2}\theta&#039;(t)^{2} - F(\theta(t)) = \frac{1}{2}\theta&#039;(t)^{2} - \frac{g}{l}cos\theta = - \alpha

\frac{1}{2}\theta&#039;(t)^{2} = \frac{g}{l}cos\theta - \alpha

\theta&#039;(t)^{2} = 2\left(\frac{g}{l}cos\theta - \alpha\right) =

\theta&#039;(t)^{2} = 2\frac{g}{l}\left(cos\theta - \frac{g}{l}\alpha\right)


Did I miss something? I want to end up with the equation below.

\left(\frac{d\theta}{dt}\right)^{2} = \frac{2g}{l}(cos\theta - cos\alpha)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K