MHB Simple Problem concerning tensor products

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Actually this problem really only concerns greatest common denominators.

In Section 10.4, Example 3 (see attachment) , Dummit and Foote where we are dealing with the tensor product $$ \mathbb{Z} / m \mathbb{Z} \otimes \mathbb{Z} / n \mathbb{Z}$$ we find the following statement: (NOTE: d is the gcd of integers m and n)

"Since $$ m(1 \otimes 1) = m \otimes 1 = 0 \otimes 1 = 0 $$

and similarly

$$ n(1 \otimes 1) = 1 \otimes n = 1 \otimes 0 = 0 $$

we have

$$ d(1 \otimes 1) = 0 $$ ... ... "

Basically we have

mx = 0 and nx = 0 and have to show dx = 0

It must be simple but I cannot see it!

Can someone please help?

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This comes from the fact that the gcd of two numbers can always be written as a linear combination of them. If $d = \text{gcd}(m,n)$ then there are integers $s,t$ such that $d=sm+tn.$ Then $dx = (sm+tn)x = s(mx) + t(nx) = 0.$
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K