Simple stress, strain, elongation relationship question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the normal stress, normal strain, and elongation of a circular steel bar subjected to an axial load of 50 kN. The normal stress is determined to be 159 MPa, and the normal strain is calculated as 795 x 10^-6. The elongation is correctly calculated as 0.8 mm, which is derived from the strain multiplied by the original length of 1 m. The participant, Claudius, initially miscalculated the elongation due to a misunderstanding of metric conversions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of normal stress and strain concepts
  • Familiarity with material properties, specifically Elastic Modulus
  • Basic knowledge of axial loading in structural engineering
  • Proficiency in metric system conversions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between stress, strain, and elongation in materials
  • Learn about the properties of steel and its Elastic Modulus
  • Explore axial loading effects on different cross-sectional shapes
  • Review metric system conversions and their applications in engineering calculations
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, structural engineers, and anyone involved in material mechanics or stress analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Iclaudius
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Howdy ya'll,

a relatively simple question,

A circular bar 20mm in diameter and 1m long is subjected to an axial load of 50kN. Determine:

(i) The normal stress.
(ii) The normal strain.
(iii) The elongation.

Assume the material is steel with an Elastic Modulus of 200GPa.

ok so i got normal stress = 159 MPa, normal strain = 795*10^-6,
but here is my problem - solving for elongation why can i not just plug in the strain amount and solve for the change in length i.e strain * original length = change in length?
by the way elongation = 0.8mm which is not what i get using the aforementioned method.

(sorry for no math symbols)
Thanks in advance,
Claudius
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
795 x 10-6 multiplied by 1 m is not approximately 0.8 mm?
 
oh snap, don't know what i was thinking lol, thanks for pointing out my oversight, guess i need more practice with the metric system :(
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
11K