Simple vector-decomposition (fluid mechanics)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the decomposition of force vectors in fluid mechanics, specifically regarding the net flux of x-momentum across an infinitesimal surface element, dS. The force vector πx is analyzed in relation to its direction and interaction with the surface element. The momentum flux vector, represented as \vec{N_x}, is clarified to include both normal and tangential components, with the normal component being ρv_xv_x\vec{i_x} and the tangential components being ρv_xv_y\vec{i_y} and ρv_xv_z\vec{i_z}. This understanding is crucial for accurately interpreting fluid behavior at the surface level.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with vector decomposition
  • Knowledge of Newton's second law of motion
  • Basic grasp of momentum flux concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector decomposition in fluid mechanics
  • Learn about momentum flux in fluid dynamics
  • Explore the implications of Newton's second law in fluid contexts
  • Investigate the role of surface elements in fluid flow analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students of fluid mechanics, educators teaching fluid dynamics, and professionals involved in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am reading an introductory book on fluid mechanics (freely available on the WWW) and I came across this on page 10:

Consider an infinitesimal plane surface element, dS = ndS, located at point r. Here, dS is the area of the element, and n its unit normal. The fluid which lies on that side of the element toward which n points is said to lie on its positive side, and vice versa. The net flux of x-momentum across the element (in the direction of n) is πx · dS, which implies (from Newton’s second law of motion) that the fluid on the positive side of the surface element experiences a force πx ·dS in the x-direction due to short-range interaction with the fluid on the negative side.

I don't understand the underlined part. We have a force-vector πx, which we decompose to find the overlap with some surface element dS. Shouldn't the force entering dS be directed along dS, and not πx as the author claims?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Niles said:

Homework Statement


I am reading an introductory book on fluid mechanics (freely available on the WWW) and I came across this on page 10:



I don't understand the underlined part. We have a force-vector πx, which we decompose to find the overlap with some surface element dS. Shouldn't the force entering dS be directed along dS, and not πx as the author claims?

Thanks in advance.
It's hard to get past all this unusual notation, with the symbol n being used for two different things (momentum flux and normal), but I think I know what they are trying to say. Let \vec{N_x} represent the net momentum flux (vector) through a surface of constant x. This momentum flux vector is not necessarily normal to the surface, since the fluid velocity is not necessarily normal to the surface. We can represent this momentum flux vector by:
\vec{N_x}=ρv_xv_x\vec{i_x}+ρv_xv_y\vec{i_y}+ρv_xv_z\vec{i_z}
In this example, since the surface of interest is one of constant x, \vec{dS}=\vec{i_x}dS, the component of the momentum flux normal to the surface is ρv_xv_x\vec{i_x}, and the component of the momentum flux tangential to the surface is ρv_xv_y\vec{i_y}+ρv_xv_z\vec{i_z}.
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K