1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Simple vector-decomposition (fluid mechanics)

  1. Nov 7, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    I am reading an introductory book on fluid mechanics (freely available on the WWW) and I came across this on page 10:

    I don't understand the underlined part. We have a force-vector πx, which we decompose to find the overlap with some surface element dS. Shouldn't the force entering dS be directed along dS, and not πx as the author claims?

    Thanks in advance.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 7, 2013 #2
    It's hard to get past all this unusual notation, with the symbol n being used for two different things (momentum flux and normal), but I think I know what they are trying to say. Let [itex]\vec{N_x}[/itex] represent the net momentum flux (vector) through a surface of constant x. This momentum flux vector is not necessarily normal to the surface, since the fluid velocity is not necessarily normal to the surface. We can represent this momentum flux vector by:
    [tex]\vec{N_x}=ρv_xv_x\vec{i_x}+ρv_xv_y\vec{i_y}+ρv_xv_z\vec{i_z}[/tex]
    In this example, since the surface of interest is one of constant x, [itex]\vec{dS}=\vec{i_x}dS[/itex], the component of the momentum flux normal to the surface is [itex]ρv_xv_x\vec{i_x}[/itex], and the component of the momentum flux tangential to the surface is [itex]ρv_xv_y\vec{i_y}+ρv_xv_z\vec{i_z}[/itex].
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Simple vector-decomposition (fluid mechanics)
  1. Simple fluid mechanics (Replies: 2)

  2. Simple Fluid Mechanics (Replies: 1)

  3. Fluid Mechanics (Replies: 22)

Loading...