Simple voltage divider -- why does this work?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of voltage dividers in electrical circuits, specifically addressing how voltage can be utilized after it has been dropped across resistors. Participants explore the implications of connecting additional components to a voltage divider and the conditions under which the voltage divider formula applies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to use the voltage at a node after it has been dropped across resistors, questioning if the voltage can be reused if another resistor is connected in series.
  • Another participant clarifies that connecting components to the 5V point will affect the circuit, suggesting that it may be acceptable in some scenarios, such as biasing a transistor, but problematic for powering significant loads.
  • A participant challenges the voltage analysis presented by another, emphasizing the need for Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and pointing out an error in the voltage sum.
  • One participant reiterates that voltage is not lost when dropped across components, but rather represents a voltage difference, and encourages checking external resources for clarification.
  • Another participant agrees with the initial confusion, stating that the voltage at the node can only be maintained if no additional components are connected, and explains how adding a resistor in parallel would decrease the voltage at that node.
  • A participant notes that the stability of the 5V supply depends on the resistance of the connected circuit, indicating that a high enough resistance is necessary to maintain the voltage without significant drop.
  • One participant provides a corrected voltage divider calculation assuming a 12V supply, explaining the conditions under which the voltage divider formula is valid and how additional resistors affect the current and voltage distribution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and confusion regarding the voltage divider concept. There is no consensus on the implications of connecting additional components to the voltage divider, and multiple competing views on how to apply the voltage divider formula correctly remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants' analyses contain errors or assumptions that are not fully explored, particularly regarding the application of Kirchhoff's laws and the impact of additional resistors on voltage calculations.

altruan23
Messages
22
Reaction score
5
Summary:: don't understand how can we use a voltage that has been already dropped.

image0(8).jpeg

I don't understand the voltage divider. So R1 and R2 are the same. I have 10 V in beginning, then 5V drop across R1 and then i have 5V drop across R2. But how can I use the 5V if they already dropped at R2? If i connect to the 5V node another resistor in series for example, will 5V drop again across R2? How can we use the 5V, if they drop across R2 always??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You understand correctly that hooking anything up to the 5V point will have an effect on the circuit, but it depends on what that circuit is as to whether or not the voltage divider is a bad idea. If, for example, you were just forward biasing the base of an NPN transistor through a high resistance it would be fine. If on the other hand you were trying to power a significant 5V circuit, it would not work well at all.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker, Jody and altruan23
image0(10).jpeg

So i start with 10V, i get a voltage drop on R1 --> 7.2V
Remainder is 4.8V which drops on R2. How do we have in node A 4.8V and then they drop across R3 and R4, if the 4.8V already dropped across R2 in the first loop??
 
Your analysis is incorrect. The "drop" across R3 and R4 has to be the same as across R2 because the total around any closed loop has to be 0. You need to show your method in detail. Kirchhoff.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: altruan23
First, there's an error in your analysis since ##4.8+7.2 \neq 10V##. The voltage drops must be equal, or, as KVL says, the voltages around any loop in the circuit must sum to zero. Try again.

The voltage at node ##A## is indeed the voltage across both ##R2## and across ##R3+R4##. The voltage isn't lost when it's "dropped", that is just means "voltage difference across components".

Check out this video: https://www.khanacademy.org/science...rcuits-resistance/v/ee-kirchhoffs-voltage-law
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: altruan23
altruan23 said:
Summary:: don't understand how can we use a voltage that has been already dropped.

View attachment 297782
I don't understand the voltage divider. So R1 and R2 are the same. I have 10 V in beginning, then 5V drop across R1 and then i have 5V drop across R2. But how can I use the 5V if they already dropped at R2? If i connect to the 5V node another resistor in series for example, will 5V drop again across R2? How can we use the 5V, if they drop across R2 always??

I think your intuition is correct here. You will only have 5V at that central node if there are no other components connected to that node.

You can still "use" the voltage at that node if, for example, you add another resistor in parallel with R2, but that will cause the voltage to decrease at that node. This is because some of the current that was originally flowing through R2 to generate the 5V across it will now be diverted to flow through the new load. There will still be some useable voltage there, but it will be decreased in proportion to the amount of current that your additional load requires. Then the voltage across R1 will increase because of that decreased voltage.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: altruan23
sorry i wanted to write 12V instead of 10V
 
How useful and stable the 5 volt supply depends on the resistance of the circuit connected to it. You can count on 5 volts if the connected circuit resistance is high enough so that the voltage drop is not significant.
 
Can I add a few words.

Assume the supply is 12V.

The simple voltage divider formula for the Post #1 circuit gives:
##V_2 = V_0 \times \frac {R_2}{R_1 + R_2}= 12 \times \frac {1}{1 + 1} = 6V##

But the voltage divider formula only works correctly when there are equal currents through the series resistors. (Nearly equal currents will give an approximate answer which may be accurate enough in many situations.)

For the Post#1circuit, the same current flows through ##R_1## and ##R_2## so there is no problem

But for the Post #3 circuit, the current through ##R_2## is less than the current through ##R_1##. So we can’t use the voltage divider formula unless we allow for the additional resistors.

In the Post #3 circuit, the bottom three resistors have a total resistance (say ##R_A##) ##= (2k||1k) = \frac 2 3 k##.

So to use the voltage divider formula correctly for the Post #3 circuit, you must treat R_1 and R_A as the two series resistors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: altruan23 and DaveE

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K