MHB Simplify expression with laws of indices

dmarley
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Helping my daughter with her math and hit this one and not sure how to advise. All help welcome(x-2y10)3 / (x-4yz4)-5

This one throws me off because I don't know how to deal with the z, as only on the right side of the divide
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dmarley said:
(x-2y10)3 / (x-4yz4)-5
This one throws me off because I don't know how to deal with the z, as only on the right side of the divide
z^(4*(-5)) = z^(-20)
Now move to numerator:
z^(-20) = z^20

So you'll end up with: y^35 * z^20 / x^26
 
dmarley said:
Helping my daughter with her math and hit this one and not sure how to advise. All help welcome(x-2y10)3 / (x-4yz4)-5

This one throws me off because I don't know how to deal with the z, as only on the right side of the divide
The basic rule is [math]a^{-1} = \dfrac{1}{a}[/math] and [math]\left ( a^{-1} \right ) ^{-1} = a[/math].

Strategy: Get rid of those pesky negative powers.
[math]\dfrac{ \left ( x^{-2}y^{10} \right ) ^3 }{ \left ( x^{-4} y z^4 \right ) ^{-5} }[/math]

[math]= \left ( x^{-2}y^{10} \right ) ^3 \left ( x^{-4} y z^4 \right ) ^5[/math]

[math]= \left ( \dfrac{y^{10}}{x^2} \right ) ^3 \left ( \dfrac{yz^4}{x^4} \right ) ^5[/math]

Can you finish?

-Dan
 
topsquark - thanks for the help

following your basic rule really helped out and clarified for us.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top