Simplify tensor product statement

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the equality ##(Z \otimes Y)^{\dagger} = Z \otimes Y## using properties of the tensor product and self-adjoint operators in quantum mechanics. The user correctly identifies that ##(Z \otimes Y)^{\dagger} = Z^{\dagger} \otimes Y^{\dagger}## holds due to the properties of the tensor product, and further concludes that since both ##Z## and ##Y## are self-adjoint, the equality holds. The user also suggests exploring tensor indexing notation for a more detailed understanding and references the Wikipedia page on Hermitian matrices for additional insights.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor products in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of self-adjoint operators
  • Familiarity with quantum gates, specifically ##Z## and ##Y##
  • Basic knowledge of matrix operations and properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of tensor products in quantum mechanics
  • Study self-adjoint operators and their implications in quantum theory
  • Learn about quantum gate operations and their matrix representations
  • Explore tensor indexing notation and its applications in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, mathematicians working in quantum mechanics, and students studying linear algebra and quantum computing will benefit from this discussion.

Albert01
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

if I wanted to show ##(Z \otimes Y)^{\dagger} = Z \otimes Y##, then I could simply multiply out the matrices belonging to the operators of quantum gates ##Z## and ##Y##.

But my question is whether this is also solvable via the properties of the tensor product and the properties of the gates.

My approach would be the following:

##(Z \otimes Y)^{\dagger} = Z^{\dagger} \otimes Y^{\dagger}##

holds because this is a property of the tensor product. Continue with

##Z^{\dagger} \otimes Y^{\dagger} = Z \otimes Y##

which holds because ##Z^{\dagger} = Z## and ##Y^{\dagger} = Y## are self-adjoint.

My question, is it possible to do it this way now or did I miss something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That seems reasonable although is the product reversed to be Y x Z?

Another approach would be to use Tensor indexing notation and apply the rules. That way you can see the details of what you have.

Have you searched for a proof to see how others have done it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermitian_matrix
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
9K