I Simplify tensor product statement

Albert01
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

if I wanted to show ##(Z \otimes Y)^{\dagger} = Z \otimes Y##, then I could simply multiply out the matrices belonging to the operators of quantum gates ##Z## and ##Y##.

But my question is whether this is also solvable via the properties of the tensor product and the properties of the gates.

My approach would be the following:

##(Z \otimes Y)^{\dagger} = Z^{\dagger} \otimes Y^{\dagger}##

holds because this is a property of the tensor product. Continue with

##Z^{\dagger} \otimes Y^{\dagger} = Z \otimes Y##

which holds because ##Z^{\dagger} = Z## and ##Y^{\dagger} = Y## are self-adjoint.

My question, is it possible to do it this way now or did I miss something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That seems reasonable although is the product reversed to be Y x Z?

Another approach would be to use Tensor indexing notation and apply the rules. That way you can see the details of what you have.

Have you searched for a proof to see how others have done it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermitian_matrix
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
847
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K