Undergrad Simplify tensor product statement

Click For Summary
To show that (Z ⊗ Y)† = Z ⊗ Y, one can utilize the properties of the tensor product and the self-adjoint nature of the quantum gates Z and Y. The equation (Z ⊗ Y)† = Z† ⊗ Y† holds due to tensor product properties, leading to Z† ⊗ Y† = Z ⊗ Y since both Z and Y are self-adjoint. The discussion raises a question about the potential for reversing the product order to Y x Z, but this is not necessary in this context. Additionally, using tensor indexing notation could clarify the details of the proof. Overall, the approach appears valid, and exploring existing proofs may provide further insights.
Albert01
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

if I wanted to show ##(Z \otimes Y)^{\dagger} = Z \otimes Y##, then I could simply multiply out the matrices belonging to the operators of quantum gates ##Z## and ##Y##.

But my question is whether this is also solvable via the properties of the tensor product and the properties of the gates.

My approach would be the following:

##(Z \otimes Y)^{\dagger} = Z^{\dagger} \otimes Y^{\dagger}##

holds because this is a property of the tensor product. Continue with

##Z^{\dagger} \otimes Y^{\dagger} = Z \otimes Y##

which holds because ##Z^{\dagger} = Z## and ##Y^{\dagger} = Y## are self-adjoint.

My question, is it possible to do it this way now or did I miss something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That seems reasonable although is the product reversed to be Y x Z?

Another approach would be to use Tensor indexing notation and apply the rules. That way you can see the details of what you have.

Have you searched for a proof to see how others have done it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermitian_matrix
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K