Simplifying cos(2arctan(x)): Is this the most simplified form?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter steph124355
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplify
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the simplification of the expression cos(2arctan(x)), which is derived using the identity cos(2θ) = (1 - tan²θ) / (1 + tan²θ). By substituting θ with arctan(x), the expression simplifies to (1 - x²) / (1 + x²). The participants confirm that this simplification is correct, emphasizing that x² cannot be zero or negative, and suggest that while factorization techniques could be explored, they do not significantly aid in further simplification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities, specifically cos(2θ).
  • Familiarity with inverse trigonometric functions, particularly arctan.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills, including factorization.
  • Knowledge of domain restrictions in mathematical expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced trigonometric identities and their applications.
  • Study the properties and graphs of inverse trigonometric functions.
  • Learn about domain and range restrictions in algebraic expressions.
  • Investigate factorization techniques for polynomial expressions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on trigonometry and algebra, as well as anyone looking to deepen their understanding of function simplification techniques.

steph124355
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have gotten this far:

Using cos(2θ) = 1-tan2θ / 1+tan2θ From a previous question:

Let θ= arctan(x):

cos(2θ) = 1-tan2(arctan(x)) / 1+tan2(arctan(x))

=1-x2 / 1+x2

Where x2 cannot equal 0 or a negative number

Have I done this in the right way and if so is this as far as I can simplify it?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You did the simplification correctly, but usually we give the domain in terms of x, not its square. And why is x^2 not allowed to be zero? x^2 can never be negative, but how about x?

As for the simplification, in such cases you could try to do some factorization (e.g. x^2 - 1 = (x + 1)(x - 1)) and cancel something in the top and bottom, though you'll find in this case that such an approach doesn't help you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
911
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K