Simplifying finite geometric series expression

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying a finite geometric series expressed as \(\sum_{n=0}^{N}e^{-na}\), where \(a\) represents a constant. The original poster identifies the series as geometric with a common ratio of \(e^{-a}\) and attempts to manipulate it into a form involving hyperbolic sine functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to simplify the series using properties of geometric series and hyperbolic functions but encounters difficulties in further reduction. Some participants question the necessity of the specific form involving hyperbolic functions, while others provide alternative simplifications.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the expression and its applications. Some guidance has been offered regarding simplification, but no consensus has been reached on the best approach or form.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific contexts, such as interference from multiple wave sources, which may influence the desired form of the expression. There is also a hint at potential constraints related to the physical interpretation of the series.

Beer-monster
Messages
285
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I've come across the type of sum in several places/problems but seem to be making no progress in trying to simplifying it further.

We have a finite series of some exponential function.

\sum_{n=0}^{N}e^{-na}

Where a is some constant, a quantum of energy or a phase factor etc.

Now I know that this is actually a geometric series with the common ratio e^{-a} and the first term = 1. So the using the sum of N terms of a geometric series we have.


\sum_{n=0}^{N}e^{-na} = \frac{1-e^{-Na}}{1-e^{-a}}

If I take out a factor of e^{-Na/2} from the numerator I can rewrite it as an hyperbolic sine function. I can do something similar for the denominator using a factor of e^{-a/2}, this gives:

\sum_{n=0}^{N}e^{-na} = \frac{e^{-Na/2}}{e^{a/2}}\frac{sinh{\frac{Na}{2}}}{sinh{\frac{a}{2}}}

Here's where I get stuck. I can't think how to reduce this any further or clean it up. Can anyone suggest anything or point out a mistake I've made.

Thanks

BM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Beer-Monster.

The expression you've given in the second last equation line is very simple: Did you have a reason why you wanted to get it in a particular form (like a hyperbolic trig function)?
 
One example where I felt something like that was needed involved interference from multiple wave sources. Each source successive source considered would add a phase differences \delta. I managed to treat the waves as complex exponentials, with led to a similar sum but with a complex exponential. I was asked to determine the intensity as a function of angle from the sources. This seemed to suggest an answer as a trigonometric function of \theta.
 
You can simplify the first ratio to exp (-(N+1)a/2). I don't think this helps much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K