Simplifying Integration: A Common Question Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter majin_andrew
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the integration of the function f(x) = (x-a)², specifically comparing two methods: expanding the brackets before integration versus integrating directly. The user, Andrew, notes a discrepancy in the constants of integration (C) between the two approaches. The conclusion drawn by rock.freak667 clarifies that the constants are indeed different, with the first integral yielding a constant that can be expressed as k, aligning it with the form of the second integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, particularly integration.
  • Familiarity with polynomial functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of constants of integration in indefinite integrals.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions and equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of definite and indefinite integrals in calculus.
  • Learn about the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and its implications for integration.
  • Explore techniques for integrating polynomial functions, including substitution methods.
  • Investigate the role of constants of integration in various integration scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on calculus, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of integration techniques and the nuances of constants in mathematical expressions.

majin_andrew
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
This isn't a homework question, just something I was wondering about, and this seemed like the most appropriate place to post it because of its simplicity.

When integrating a function of the form f(x)=(x-a)[tex]^{n}[/tex], I find I get a different result if I expand the brackets first and then integrate.

Example:
[tex]\int[/tex]2(x-5)dx = (x-5)[tex]^{2}[/tex] + C = x[tex]^{2}[/tex]-10x-25 + C
[tex]\int[/tex]2x-10dx = x[tex]^{2}[/tex]-10x + C

I was wondering if the C in the first equation will simply just be 25 greater than the C in the second equation, or is there more to it than that?

Thanks for your time,
Andrew
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In your two integrals, the values of 'C' are different. In the first one you have -25 + C, which is in itself another constant k. So you can rewrite it as x2 -10x+k. Which is in the same form as your second integral.
 
Thanks rock.freak667!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K