Simulating Heat Diffusion from Laser Beam on Sample

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around simulating heat diffusion from a laser beam striking a sample, specifically focusing on the temperature distribution over time as a function of position. The context includes theoretical modeling and mathematical approaches to heat diffusion in different coordinate systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using the heat diffusion equation in 1D Cartesian coordinates for simplicity, questioning whether this approach is valid given the radial symmetry of the problem.
  • Another participant inquires about the geometry of the setup, specifically whether the laser beam affects the entire sphere or just a point on a flat target, and whether the beam penetrates the surface.
  • A later reply clarifies that the setup involves a flat horizontal target being heated by a short pulse laser beam, with heat diffusion occurring radially from the point of contact.
  • One participant suggests considering cylindrical coordinates for the problem, noting that heat loss from the surface due to convection and radiation complicates the model, potentially leading to a nonlinear partial differential equation (PDE).
  • Another participant mentions that omitting radiation loss could simplify the equation to a linear form, which could then be solved using separation of variables and variation of parameters.
  • There is a suggestion that using a finite element program like ABAQUS might be the best approach to solve the problem accurately, cautioning against making too many assumptions that could oversimplify the situation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate coordinate system to use for the simulation, with some favoring Cartesian coordinates and others suggesting cylindrical coordinates. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to model the heat diffusion accurately.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations such as the dependence on the assumptions made about the geometry of the problem, the effects of heat loss mechanisms, and the complexity introduced by nonlinear terms in the PDE.

datsyuk
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello, I am trying to simulate the heat diffusion from a laser beam striking a sample. My model/concept is very simple in that it assumes the temperature distribution will be a radially symetric sphere (i.e T=T(r,t)).

I would like to plot a temperature profile evolving through time as a function of position from the initial contact of the laser beam. I am not making a 2D/3D map of the temperature distribution but simply a position vs T plot evolve through time.

My question is that can I use the solution for the heat diffusion equation in 1D cartesian coordinates to simulate the temperature distribution from the initial point of contact or would I have to use the spherical heat diffusion equation. The reason is that the solution for 1d cartesian is readily available while in spherical coordinates obtaining the solution is a bit more difficult.



Homework Equations


Heat Diffusion Equations
Cartesian

dT/dt=a(d^2/dx^2), where a represents thermal diffusivity

Spherical

1/r^2(d(r^2dT/dr)dr)=1/a(dT/dt), since no dependence on theta or phi


The Attempt at a Solution


I am currently simulating the heat diffusion using the solution from the 1d cartesian coordinate heat diffusion equation but I am not sure if this is entirely correct. Also, I would imagine that my temperature profiles would be the same as long as a set my position axis to be centered at the origin (point of contact of laser beam).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the sphere completely immersed by the laser beam or is the laser beam relatively small with respect to the sphere so that only a point on the sphere is being heated? Furthermore, does the beam pass through the surface of the sphere?
 
Thanks for your response. I've attached a simple diagram to show what it looks like.

I'm not irradiated a sphere. I will be irradiated a flat horizontal target (e.g. microscope slide). The sphere represents the heat diffusing from the target. Also the beam is a short pulse and therefore once I have irradiated the sample resulting in the initial temperature increase, all there will be left will be the heat diffusing from where the beam initially made contact with the sample.

In other words, I am introducing a temperature increase on the target with the laser beam (with negligible diameter). After the initial temperature increase, the beam is not present but what we have is heat diffusing in all directions, including a direction parallel to the flat target, and diffusion representing radial symetry. Therefore if we made a 3D map of the temperature at a certain time point, we would notice a sphere and one in which the temperature was only dependent on the radial position from the origin (which in our case would be the point of contact of the beam onto the target).

I only care about the temperature profile as a function of horizontal position from the point of contact of the beam.
 

Attachments

  • laser heat.jpg
    laser heat.jpg
    7.2 KB · Views: 507
Since it is a slide with only a point being heated, I would consider solving it using cylindrical coordinates in one dimension - Fourier equation. The axis would be perpendicular to the slide. The complication is that the slide will lose heat from its surface by both convection and radiation. The latter will cause the PDE to be nonlinear. If you omit radiation loss from the surface, the equation can be solved by omitting the non-homogeneous convective loss term (leaving the Fourier equation), then accounting for it by the method called variation of parameters. The solution would be a combination of separation of variables for the homogeneous equation, the variation of parameters for the non-homogeneous heat loss term.

Obvously the best way to solve it is to use a finite element program such as ABAQUS. If you make too many assumptions, you are assuming the problem away.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K