Single biggest obstacle to Earth bacteria thriving on Mars

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The primary obstacle for Earth's extremophile microorganisms thriving on Mars is the combination of low liquid water availability and lack of organic material. While certain extremophiles, such as Deinococcus radiodurans, exhibit remarkable resilience to extreme conditions including radiation and dehydration, they face significant challenges in adapting to Mars' harsh environment. The consensus among forum participants is that no single extremophile can survive all of Mars' extreme conditions simultaneously, making survival and proliferation unlikely without human assistance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of extremophiles and their adaptations
  • Knowledge of Martian environmental conditions
  • Familiarity with microbial survival mechanisms in extreme environments
  • Basic concepts of astrobiology and planetary protection
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the survival mechanisms of Deinococcus radiodurans in extreme environments
  • Explore the concept of panspermia and its implications for microbial life on Mars
  • Investigate the potential for microbial life in subsurface Martian environments
  • Study the effects of low atmospheric pressure on microbial survival
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for astrobiologists, microbiologists, planetary scientists, and anyone interested in the potential for life on Mars and the challenges of extraterrestrial microbial survival.

  • #61
The question reminded me of the article that BillTree mentions, that shows how UV light is probably the largest problem on the surface. (Mind that the experiment is limited as of yet using just one hardy strain; though since it was drought resistant it should also be radiation resistant due to the copious DNA repair mechanisms.)The question is hard to answer since it maps a lot of source ecologies of thermophiles onto a lot of potential cornucopia of ecologies on Mars from the top of its atmosphere way down in the crust. The most promising current habitat would be deep in the crust, in which case any living populations would share much the same conditions as deep in our crust. Though Yggdrasil's article may point in other directions...On another matter, though I appreciate curiosity on behalf of science I also appreciate (due) diligence. Here are some curious references that a modicum of googling would have rejected:
infinitebubble said:
Interesting... there were meteorite rocks with bacteria found within these rocks blasted from Mars during a strike from a meteor long ago.See: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lpi/meteorites/The_Meteorite.shtml
The modern consensus is that it was neither nano-cells (too small to be anything like "bacteria") nor fossil remains of them. Every property found has an abiotic explanation. [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Hills_84001 ]
infinitebubble said:
There are - as far as I know - no peer review articles that has shown any such data.
syhprum1 said:
I understand that bacteria were found on a TV camera that was returned from the Moon by one of the Apollo misions
Due to failures of protocol lab contamination after opening the camera cannot be excluded and is the most likely explanation. [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reports_of_Streptococcus_mitis_on_the_Moon ]
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
12K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
21K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
26K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K