Why Does the Inverter Waveform Not Align with Theoretical Predictions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the discrepancies between theoretical predictions and actual inverter waveform behavior in RLC load circuits. The key conclusion is that the load current, being sinusoidal, causes the commutating diode pairs to switch, resulting in voltage changes at specific instances, such as wt=pi. The discussion highlights that while the switches are off, conduction occurs through the anti-parallel body diodes, leading to voltage transitions from -Vdc/2 to +Vdc/2. The participants agree that understanding the sinusoidal nature of the load current is crucial for resolving the waveform alignment issue.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inverter circuits and operation
  • Knowledge of RLC circuit behavior
  • Familiarity with sinusoidal waveforms and their properties
  • Experience with diode switching in power electronics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of RLC circuit analysis in power electronics
  • Learn about the role of anti-parallel diodes in inverter circuits
  • Research the effects of sinusoidal load currents on inverter performance
  • Explore the dynamics of switching in SMPS designs
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, power electronics specialists, and students studying inverter design and RLC circuit behavior will benefit from this discussion.

cnh1995
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
3,487
Reaction score
1,163
Homework Statement
Find the pole voltage waveform Vao.
Relevant Equations
Waveform plotting based on KCL and KVL.
20201108_141805.png

The answer given is d).

Seeing the problem statement, it can be concluded that the load has some inductance, and when the switches S1, S2, S3 and S4 are off, conduction takes place through the anti-parallel body diodes (freewheeling action).

Seeing the triggering pulse waveforms, S1-S4 ON, Vao= +Vdc/2
S1-S4 OFF, D2-D3 ON, Vao = -Vdc/2.
This is only seen in d). So I can eliminate a), b) and c).

But I find d) incorrect as well.
The load current at "wt=pi" is 0 as per the problem statement. This means neither the switches nor the diodes are conducting at wt=pi. So how can Vao jump from -Vdc/2 to +Vdc/2 at wt= pi?
Shouldn't it be floating at some unknown value?

What am I missing here?
Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the load current is sinusoidal it is changing polarity when it crosses zero at pi. This will cause the commutating diode pairs to switch, that is why the voltage changes. I suppose at the precise instant the current changes you could argue it's floating, but that's virtually zero duration.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cnh1995
DaveE said:
Since the load current is sinusoidal it is changing polarity when it crosses zero at pi.
Yes, I agree with your reasoning.
Looks like the load is RLC type, and the voltage across C at wt=pi is responsible for diode pair switching.
I believe I was overthinking; it wasn't necessary to know the type of load and its components . Only 'the current is sinuoidal' part is enough to answer this question.

Thanks a lot! I have to stop overthinking.o0)
 
In SMPS designs where the inductor current is discontinuous (i.e. the energy stored is all used in each cycle), then you do see the switch voltages floating at times. In practice this almost always looks like part of a sinusoidal resonance of parasitic L & C. So your intuition wasn't too far off.

edit: Oops, inductor current is never discontinuous. I should have said load, or input current.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cnh1995

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K