Single slit diffraction pattern

Click For Summary
A single slit diffraction pattern is analyzed with the first minimum at 40 degrees and a wavelength of 410 nm, while a second light source produces a second minimum at 60 degrees. The width of the slit is calculated using the formula w=2(λ)L/a, but initial attempts yielded incorrect results due to angle conversion errors. It is emphasized that the small angle approximation applies only when angles are in radians, which is crucial for accurate calculations. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the problem and using appropriate formulas. The final calculations lead to a clearer understanding of the diffraction pattern and its parameters.
kevnm67
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A single slit forms a diffraction pattern, with the first minimum at an angle of 40 from the central maximum. Monochromatic light of 410 nm wavelength is used. The same slit, illuminated by a different monochromatic light source, produces a diffraction pattern with the second minimum at a 60 angle from the central maximum. (Remember to convert degrees to radians – Recall: 2πrad=〖360〗^0.)
A) What is the width of the slit?
a. 587 nm b. 103 nm c. 1170 nm

B) What is the wavelength of the second light source?
a. 587 nm b. 307 nm c. 615 nm

C) If the screen is placed 1 meter away, what is the width of the central maximum for the 410 nm light source?
a. 0.70 m b. 1.4 m c. 2.



Homework Equations



w=2(λ)L/a

The Attempt at a Solution



a) I solved for "a" and got 7 x 10-9 but don't know where to go from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kevnm67 said:
a) I solved for "a" and got 7 x 10-9 but don't know where to go from here?
Show how you got that answer.

Did you copy the problem correctly? I don't see any of the answer choices as being correct.
 
Doc Al said:
Show how you got that answer.

Did you copy the problem correctly? I don't see any of the answer choices as being correct.

Yep, it's copied correctly...

for a I did:

theta = p (lamda/a)
and I get 10.25, not the other no., I used the wrong angle.
 
kevnm67 said:
Yep, it's copied correctly...

for a I did:

theta = p (lamda/a)
Ah... that formula is only an approximation. It's only true in the small angle limit, where sin(theta) ≈ theta, where theta is in radians. (I wondered why they mentioned radians!)

Using that approximation, I can see how they get their answers.
and I get 10.25, not the other no., I used the wrong angle.
Redo this calculation. In using the formula, make sure you convert the angle to radians.
 
Ok. I got it all now...radians! Thanks again, Dr. Al, ill be sure to give you credit on my final tomorrow ;)
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
990
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K