Singular Values & Linear Transformations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between singular values of matrices A and B under a non-singular linear transformation T, defined as B = TA. The user explores the singular value decomposition (SVD) of both matrices, expressing A as UAΛAV_A^T and B as UBΛBV_B^T. They conclude that if T is orthogonal/unitary, the singular values of A and B are identical, but they seek to establish a broader relationship for the case where T is merely full-rank. The discussion emphasizes the importance of the properties of T in determining the singular values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)
  • Knowledge of linear transformations and their properties
  • Familiarity with matrix dimensions and operations
  • Concept of non-singular and full-rank matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of orthogonal/unitary transformations on singular values
  • Study the properties of full-rank matrices in relation to SVD
  • Explore the relationship between singular values and linear transformations in greater depth
  • Investigate examples of non-singular transformations and their effects on matrix decompositions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, data scientists, and engineers working with linear algebra, particularly those focusing on matrix transformations and singular value decomposition.

grawil
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm struggling to grasp what should be a trivial property of singular value decomposition. Say that I have a linear transformation T that is non-singular (i.e. [tex]T^{-1}[/tex] exists) and relates matrices A and B:

[tex]B = T A[/tex]

or

[tex]A = T^{-1} B[/tex]

What I would like to know is how the singular values of A and B are related?

A and B are both dimension (m x n), i.e. T is square (m x m). My thoughts are:

[tex]A = U_A \Lambda_A V_A^T[/tex]

[tex]B = U_B \Lambda_B V_B^T[/tex]

where U is (m x m), [tex]\Lambda[/tex] is (m x n) and V is (n x n). Substitution gives

[tex]T A = U_B \Lambda_B V_B^T[/tex]

[tex]T U_A \Lambda_A V_A^T = U_B \Lambda_B V_B^T[/tex]

but I'm not sure where to go next. From the above, can I simply write:

[tex]T U_A = U_B[/tex]

[tex]\Lambda_A = \Lambda_B[/tex]

[tex]V_A = V_B[/tex]

This implies the singular values are identical (with the caveat that T is non-singular) and that only the basis vectors of A are affected by the transformation... this is what I want to show but I'm unsure if I've actually succeeded with the above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After a bit more thought... the above is only true if T is orthogonal/unitary. I still think it is possible to relate the singular values of A and TA for the slightly more general case where T is full-rank (i.e. non-singular) but I'm not entirely sure how. Obviously, if T is not of full rank then all bets are off.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K