Singularities in the harmonic oscillator propagator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the singularities in the harmonic oscillator propagator, specifically at the points where \( t_2 - t_1 = n\pi / \omega \). The harmonic oscillator propagator is defined as \( W(q_2,t_2 ; q_1,t_1) = \sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\pi i \hbar \sin \omega (t_2-t_1)}} \times \exp \left(\frac{im\omega}{2\hbar \sin \omega (t_2-t_1)}\left[ (q_1^2+q_2^2)\cos \omega (t_2-t_1)-2q_2q_1\right]\right) \). The singularities occur periodically due to the dynamical SU(2) symmetry of the harmonic oscillator and are explained by the periodic nature of the wave functions, which have a period \( T = \frac{2\pi}{\omega} \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Field Theory (QFT) fundamentals
  • Understanding of harmonic oscillator mechanics
  • Familiarity with propagators in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of the Heisenberg picture in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of "caustics" in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of SU(2) symmetry in quantum systems
  • Explore the derivation of propagators using the Heisenberg picture
  • Investigate the periodic properties of wave functions in harmonic oscillators
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in Quantum Field Theory, physicists interested in harmonic oscillators, and anyone studying the mathematical properties of quantum propagators.

Cancer
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi people!
Today I was doing some QFT homework and in one of them they ask me to calculate the Harmonic Oscillator propagator, which, as you may know is:
W(q_2,t_2 ; q_1,t_1) = \sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\pi i \hbar \sin \omega (t_2-t_1)}} \times \exp \left(\frac{im\omega}{2\hbar \sin \omega (t_2-t_1)}\left[ (q_1^2+q_2^2)\cos \omega (t_2-t_1)-2q_2q_1\right]\right)

So, the last question of the problem is explaining why do we have singularities at t_2-t_1=n\pi / \omega.
I've been searching for it on books and I've found something about the "caustics", which I've no idea what is it...
I understand that when t_2-t_1=0 it has to diverge, because the particle hasn't moved from its place as the time hasn't passed, but why it happens every half period?
It seems to me that if the function diverges at those points then we are sure of which is the position of the particle at those times, and I thought that there had to be an uncertainty for t_2-t_1 \neq 0 (I don't know if I'm explaining well enought what I think hahahhaa...)

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hm, that's a very good question. I've never thought about it, to be honest. Of course, any propagator must fulfill the boundary condition
W(q_2,0;q_3,0)=\delta(q_2-q_3).
That this occurs periodically may be caused by the dynamical SU(2) symmetry of the simple harmonic oscillator. Mathematically it's easy to understand by deriving the propgator making use of the Heisenberg picture. Solving the equations of motion for the position and momentum operators is exactly as for c-numbers, because the Hamiltonian is quadratic not only in momentum but also in position, i.e., the equations of motion are linear.
 
Cancer said:
So, the last question of the problem is explaining why do we have singularities at t_2-t_1=n\pi / \omega.
I've been searching for it on books and I've found something about the "caustics", which I've no idea what is it...
I understand that when t_2-t_1=0 it has to diverge, because the particle hasn't moved from its place as the time hasn't passed, but why it happens every half period?

Where will the particle be after one period? Remember that for the harmonic oscillator every wave function is exactly periodic with period T = 2\pi/\omega.

Now, where will the particle be after one half-period?

You might find it fun to set up and play with a harmonic oscillator potential in this applet.
 
Actually, what's interesting about the harmonic oscillator propagator is that it is periodic:
W(q_2,t_2 ; q_1,t_1) = W(q_2,t_2 + n T; q_1,t_1)

where T = \frac{2 \pi}{\omega}

Given that it is periodic, you would expect a singularity whenever t_2 - t_1 = n T, because every propagator has a singularity at t_2 - t_1 = 0

So the only mystery is why there are twice as many singularities as that. There is a singularity at t_2 - t_1 = \frac{T}{2} as well as at t_2 - t_1 = T
 
Thanks for the answers!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K