1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Singularity Functions for Beam Bending

  1. Jan 24, 2010 #1
    There is a beam of width 10cm, and vertical reaction loads on each end (x1 = 0cm, x2 = 10cm). Starting from the left end of the beam, we have a vertical distributed load of 2,000 N/m spanning from 0cm to 5cm. Finally, we have a 1,000 N point load located 7.5cm from the left end of the beam.

    Through statics, it can be said that the left most reaction load (x1 = 0cm) is of magnitude 325 N while the right most reaction load (x2 = 10cm) has a magnitude of 775 N.

    My singularity function for this system is shown below:

    [tex]V = 325<x - 0>^{0} - 2000<x - 0>^{1} + 2000<x - 0.05>^{1} - 1000<x - 0.075>^{0} + 775<x - 0.1>^{0}[/tex]

    Which, when plotted (my end goal here), works perfectly and as it should. My issue comes when I switch the shear (V) singularity function to a moment function by increasing the exponents by one (as I've been told).

    Through integration of the shear singularity function, the moment equation then becomes:

    [tex]M = 325<x - 0>^{1} - 2000<x - 0>^{2} + 2000<x - 0.05>^{2} - 1000<x - 0.075>^{1} + 775<x - 0.1>^{1}[/tex]

    Which doesn't work quite as well. The moment function falls completely apart, but from every source I've read so far, it shouldn't. Also, if I draw the moment equation by hand (through the "area under the curve" approach), it hardly matches the output of the moment singularity equation.

    Any ideas?
     
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2010
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 25, 2010 #2

    nvn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    tangodirt: But for n ≥ 0, w*integral[(<x - a>^n)*dx] = w*[1/(n+1)]*<x - a>^(n+1), not w*<x - a>^(n+1). Therefore, don't the second and third terms of your M equation contain a typographic mistake? See if this resolves the problem.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Singularity Functions for Beam Bending
  1. Bending of beams (Replies: 1)

  2. Beam bending (Replies: 1)

  3. Bending Beams (Replies: 1)

  4. Beams and bending (Replies: 7)

  5. Bending of beams (Replies: 65)

Loading...