Sinking Boat: Calculations & Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter charlie05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boat Calculations
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a sinking boat with specific dimensions and a hole in its bottom. Key calculations include determining the velocity of water entering through the hole, which is found to be approximately 5.425 m/s, and estimating the time it takes for the boat to sink, which varies based on the hole's area and water volume. The participants explore Archimedes' principle to demonstrate that the difference in water levels inside and outside the boat remains constant, emphasizing the relationship between buoyant force and displaced water. There is also a debate about the accuracy of the velocity calculation due to pressure dynamics affecting water flow. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of fluid dynamics in the context of a sinking vessel.
  • #31
AHA :-) :-) :-)

now I need to calculate b / velocity
0,5 ρ v2 = hρg ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
charlie05 said:
AHA :-) :-) :-)

now I need to calculate b / velocity
0,5 ρ v2 = hρg ?
Where h is...?
 
  • #33
that is the question :-)... column of water above the hole. ? h=1,5 m ?
 
  • #34
charlie05 said:
that is the question :-)... column of water above the hole. ? h=1,5 m ?
What force pushes the water in through the hole? What height is responsible for that?
 
  • #35
hydrostatic pressure - is generated by weight of water.
 
Last edited:
  • #36
charlie05 said:
hydrostatic pressure - is generated by weight of water.
Right, but there is water on both sides of the hole, so two hydrostatic pressures.
 
  • #37
act against each other? pressure of column 5m is reduced by the pressure of column 1,5m?
 
  • #38
charlie05 said:
act against each other? pressure of column 5m is reduced by the pressure of column 1,5m?
The only time there is a 5m height of water is when the boat is about to sink, the water outside being 5m above the hole. What column is 1.5m at that time? Did you mean 3.5m?
 
  • #39
so in fact the hydrostatic pressure makes only 2 m column?
 
  • #40
Where do the 2 meters come from? It is wrong, and I don't see any way to get that with the given 5m and 3.5m.

Did you draw a sketch?
 
  • #41
phtotal = h1ρg - h2ρg = ( 5-3,5) ρg
 
Last edited:
  • #42
charlie05 said:
phtotal = h1ρg - h2ρg = ( 5-3,5) ρg
Right.
 
  • #43
aha :-) so:

phtotal = 1/2 ρv2...v = √ 2g(h1-h2) = √ 2g*(5-3,5) = 5,425 m/s
 
  • #44
hole area...S = π * 0,012 = 0,000314 m2
in 1 s...V1 = v*S = 5,425*0,000314 = 0,0017 m3
T = V /V1 = 1750/0,0017 = 1 029 412 s = 285,95 hour
 
  • #45
charlie05 said:
hole area...S = π * 0,012 = 0,000314 m2
in 1 s...V1 = v*S = 5,425*0,000314 = 0,0017 m3
T = V /V1 = 1750/0,0017 = 1 029 412 s = 285,95 hour
Looks right.
I am a little uncertain about the applicability of v^2=2gΔh here. The water that flows in then has to be arrested by the water already present. That suggests the pressure in that stream increases a little after entering the boat, which in turn suggests the water will flow in faster than that equation says. It is different from the case of water pouring out of a tank into the open air. However, I am unable to find any discussion of this on the net.
@mfb, any comments?
 
  • #46
Thanks very much - can we please have a look at the task a/ ?

I think the proff is based on the the definitions boundancy force ?
 
  • #47
charlie05 said:
Thanks very much - can we please have a look at the task a/ ?

I think the proff is based on the the definitions boundancy force ?
I thought you had solved a) in order to write your post #29.
Yes, it is to do with Archimedes' principle, as I wrote earlier.
Try to answer my post #19.
 
  • #48
a/ Show that difference between the levels inside and outside the ship is not changed.

without hole...outside 1,5m, inside 0
Water flows in1 m...outside 2,5m...inside 1m
ship sinking...outside 5 m..inside 3,5m

...level difference is always 1,5m?

can I prove it generally?
Archimedes' principle without hole...M*g = A ( h0)*ρ * g
Archimedes' principle with hole...M*g + mg = FB = ?
 
Last edited:
  • #49
charlie05 said:
Archimedes' principle without hole...M*g = A ( h0)*ρ * g
In post #19 I wrote ho, not h0, as being the height of water outside the boat relative to the hole. Your equation is correct, but ho is a variable. Aho is the volume displaced at any time, not just at the start.
charlie05 said:
Archimedes' principle with hole...M*g + mg = FB = ?
Write m in terms of hi, A and ρ. For FB, use the volume displacement mentioned above.
 
  • #50
water weight..m= Vρ = A*hi
FB = V * ϱ * g = A* h0* ϱ * g

M*g + m*g =A ( h0)*ρ * g
A*c*ρboat *g+ A*hiwater*g = A *ho *ρ*g...

c*ρboat = ρwater (h0-hi)
density of water and boat is constant...
 
Last edited:
  • #51
charlie05 said:
water weight..m= Vρ = A*hi
FB = V * ϱ * g = A* h0* ϱ * g

M*g + m*g =A ( h0)*ρ * g
A*c*ρboat *g+ A*hiwater*g = A *ho *ρ*g...

c*ρboat = ρwater (h0-hi)
density of water and boat is constant...
That's good, except there is no point in trying to express the boat's mass in terms of a density. Just leave that as M.
In terms of these variables, what is part a asking you to prove?
 
  • #52
M*g + A*hi*ρ*g = A*h0*ρ*g
M = A *ρ*(h0-hi)
M,A and ρ is constant...(h0-hi) is constant too?
 
  • #53
Dear Charles,

Your exercise is very helpful in part a) by positioning you on the track
charlie05 said:
(h0-hi) is constant
It should dawn on you why that is so. And for that, what you really want is a graphic screenplay of this Titanic disaster,
properly embellished with symbols for ##h_*## (I leave that to you)

Here is my artistic rendering, and as you see, I already cashed in on the one item that you are asked to prove:

upload_2017-3-23_12-34-0.png

Note that the darker blue only distinguihes water inside from water outside: its ##\rho## is the same (hint hint)
 
  • Like
Likes charlie05
  • #54
thank you for the sketch, I can now imagine it, it is clear...
h0utside-hinside = 1,5m constant, in all cases
 
  • #55
That's how I suggestively have drawn it -- can you explain why it is so ?
 
  • #56
because there is still a buoyant force an empty ship?
amount of displaced water is about (A * 1.5) m3 greater than the volume of water into ship

Are posts 50,52, 54 right or not?
 
Last edited:
  • #57
haruspex said:
Looks right.
I am a little uncertain about the applicability of v^2=2gΔh here. The water that flows in then has to be arrested by the water already present. That suggests the pressure in that stream increases a little after entering the boat, which in turn suggests the water will flow in faster than that equation says. It is different from the case of water pouring out of a tank into the open air. However, I am unable to find any discussion of this on the net.
@mfb, any comments?
That velocity should be an upper estimate, with the actual velocity a bit lower. We have to add a prefactor - but that is beyond the scope of this problem.

charlie05 said:
amount of displaced water is about (A * 1.5) m3 greater than the volume of water into ship
Correct.
 
  • #58
mfb said:
That velocity should be an upper estimate, with the actual velocity a bit lower. We have to add a prefactor - but that is beyond the scope of this problem.
That is true also for a tank emptying into open air, no? I am concerned about a different issue.
The water that has passed through the hole is slowed by the surrounding water. That implies it is flowing against a pressure gradient. Thus the pressure on the immediate downstream side of the hole is less than the ambient pressure at that level inside the boat.
Note that this makes it different from the emptying tank case.
 
  • #59
haruspex said:
That is true also for a tank emptying into open air
Right.
haruspex said:
That implies it is flowing against a pressure gradient.
That is countered by the water being slowed. The water cannot get more energy than necessary to flow into the boat at that speed, no matter how exactly it is slowed down.
 
  • #60
mfb said:
That is countered by the water being slowed. The water cannot get more energy than necessary to flow into the boat at that speed, no matter how exactly it is slowed down
We're waltzing around each other.
At the level of the hole, there is an ambient pressure pu on the upstream side and pd on the downstream side, determined by the water depths. Along the stream line between the two, the pressure varies. Water accelerates into the hole, so the pressure declines there, but decelerates on the other side, implying a pressure increase. The situation is analogous to a ball rolling into a dip and up the other side.
Say the pressure minimum along the path is pm. The velocity at the hole itself is determined by pu-pm>pu-pd.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K