Skateboarder's tang. and radial acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a skateboarder rolling down a semicircular ramp, focusing on calculating radial and tangential acceleration at a specific point on the ramp. The context is within the subject area of dynamics and circular motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate radial and tangential acceleration using gravitational components but questions their approach. Other participants discuss the relationship between radial acceleration, centripetal acceleration, and gravitational forces, raising questions about their interactions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the forces involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationships between the forces, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of a frictionless surface and the role of the normal force in relation to radial acceleration. There is uncertainty about the definitions and interactions of the forces at play.

lewis198
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
This was actually an old problem I got wrong.

Homework Statement



) A skateboarder rolls down a semicircular ramp (half pipe) of radius 4.0m, starting from rest at the top of the ramp (figure 1). Assuming the surface to be frictionless, calculate his radial and tangential acceleration when he is 2.0m below the top of the ramp. What is the resultant acceleration vector (magnitude and direction, given as an angle to the horizontal) at this point?




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I equated the radial acceleration to gcos(arccos(2/4)) and the tangential to gsin(arccos(2/4))
where have I gone wrong here? to me it seems right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Radial acceleration is the resultant of centripetal acceleration and the component of mg along the radius.
 
why are they both not opposite and equal?
 
rl.bhat said:
Radial acceleration is the resultant of centripetal acceleration and the component of mg along the radius.

Why is the radial acceleration not equal and opposite component of mg along the radius?

Isn't the normal force, in this case the component of mg along the radius providing the radial acceleration?
 
The normal force does not equal the radial component of mg. (If it did the radial acceleration would be zero.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K