Sketching exponential curves with complex numbers

Click For Summary
To sketch the function y as a function of t for t≥0, the equation y = e^(0.5t + i(√7/2)t) - e^(0.5t - i(√7/2)t) simplifies to y = e^(0.5t)(i * 2sin(√7/2 * t)). The resulting function is purely imaginary, indicating that the curve will only exist along the imaginary axis. Since it represents a function from real numbers to complex numbers, it requires a three-dimensional graph to fully represent both the value and the argument. However, as clarified, the graph can be simplified to a single dimension by plotting y = e^(0.5t)sin(√7/2 * t) and labeling the y-axis as imaginary numbers. This approach effectively captures the behavior of the curve.
dan5
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
How do you go about sketching y as a function of t for t≥0

y= e(0.5t + i(√7/2)t) - e(0.5t-i(√7/2)t)


I know it goes through the origin, and the gradient is positive here. But I'm unsure on how to deal with the imaginary numbers when I have a graph of y vs t.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Can you try to simplify it using the definition of complex exponentiation. That is:

e^{a+ib}=e^a(\cos(b)+i\sin(b))
 
Thanks for that idea, I have done that and am left with

y=e0.5t ( i 2 sin (√7/2)t )

But as I am meant to be plotting y as a function of t, I don't see how the imaginary part will factor in
 
Well, it will be immediately obvious that no point on the curve will have a real part. So the curve will only move on the imaginary axis.
 
In general, a function from R to C (real numbers to complex numbers) requires two dimensions for the value as well as one dimension for the argument- in other words, a three dimensional graph! However, as micromass points out, y= [e^{0.5t}sin(\sqrt{7}{2}t)]i is always imaginary so you you really only need a single dimension for that.

Graph y= e^{0.5t}sin((\sqrt{7}/2)t), clearly labeling the "y" axis as imaginary numbers.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K