Sketching Root Locus: n=2, m=1, Angle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tekneek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root Root locus
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the root locus of a control system characterized by the equation 1 + K(S + 1)/S², which features two poles at s = 0 and one zero. Participants clarify that the two branches in the root locus diagram arise from the repeated pole at s = 0, leading to an angle of departure of 180° between the branches. The conversation also addresses the concept of root-curves on the real axis, emphasizing that the behavior of the roots is influenced by the positions of poles and zeros, which can lead to non-symmetrical movement as amplification increases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of control systems and root locus analysis
  • Familiarity with characteristic equations in control theory
  • Knowledge of poles and zeros in transfer functions
  • Basic grasp of angle of departure and root-curves
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of root locus in control systems using MATLAB or Python
  • Learn about the impact of pole-zero configurations on system stability
  • Explore the derivation and application of the angle of departure formula
  • Investigate the behavior of root-curves on the real axis in various control systems
USEFUL FOR

Control engineers, students studying control theory, and anyone involved in system stability analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Tekneek
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
The characteristic equation is 1+K(S+1)/S2 Below is the root locus diagram. I don't get why there are two branches when there is only one pole, at 0. Does it count as having two poles even if it is the same because of s^2 ? If it does then why doesn't the angle of departure make sense?

number of poles(n) = 2
number of zeros(m) = 1

angle = (2h+1)/n-m * 180 = keep getting the same angle, 180

The angle certainly does not look like 180 as it departs from its pole...
95whgh.jpg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Tekneek said:
The characteristic equation is 1+K(S+1)/S2 Below is the root locus diagram. I don't get why there are two branches when there is only one pole, at 0. Does it count as having two poles even if it is the same because of s^2 ? If it does then why doesn't the angle of departure make sense?

number of poles(n) = 2
number of zeros(m) = 1

angle = (2h+1)/n-m * 180 = keep getting the same angle, 180

The angle certainly does not look like 180 as it departs from its pole...

Yes, there are two poles, s2 = (s+0)(s+0)

The mentioned angle is the angle between the two branches (180°), not the angle between a branch and the real-axis.

I don't recognize this formula: angle = (2h+1)/n-m * 180°.

Rule 1) If the number of poles in the same point = n, then the angle between the n branches = 360°/n.

Rule 2) There will be a root-curve on the real-axis at a point, if the number of real (zeroes+poles) to the right of that point is odd.
 
Last edited:
Hesch said:
Yes, there are two poles, s2 = (s+0)(s+0)

The mentioned angle is the angle between the two branches (180°), not the angle between a branch and the real-axis.

I don't recognize this formula: angle = (2h+1)/n-m * 180°.

Rule 1) If the number of poles in the same point = n, then the angle between the n branches = 360°/n.

Rule 2) There will be a root-curve on the real-axis at a point, if the number of real (zeroes+poles) to the right of that point is odd.

What does it mean by root-curve on the real axis? Also how would I know the root locus moves in a circular pattern?
 
Tekneek said:
What does it mean by root-curve on the real axis?

Look at your attached figure: There is a root-curve (actually 2) on the real axis (imaginary part = 0) for s < -1, because there is 1 zero and 2 poles to the right of all points on the real axis when s < -1.

Tekneek said:
Also how would I know the root locus moves in a circular pattern?

Poles will repel roots and zeros will attrack roots as the amplification in a control-loop is increased. Say you have three poles in the same point. If not the roots should leave these poles in a mutual angle of 120°, what should they do instead, and why?

Having left the startpoint (at some distance from the startpoint) the roots will no longer spread symmetrically because they then "can sense" other poles (repelling) and zeros (attracking).

Recommendation: Invent some sets of poles and zeroes and "play" with them on your screen. See what the root-curves will do in different combinations. Confirm the rules in #2.

Examples here:

https://www.google.com/search?q=roo...KcsgH064D4CQ&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=1366&bih=635
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K