What Does Skew Symmetry Imply for One-Dimensional Systems?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of skew symmetry in one-dimensional systems, particularly in the context of the equation p_dot = S(omega)*p, where p represents state vectors and S is a skew symmetric matrix. The user inquires about the behavior of the system when constrained to the z state, questioning whether z_dot can be expressed as z_dot = -q*x + p*y or if it simplifies to z_dot = z. The responses clarify that in one dimension, skew symmetry leads to S being zero, thus rendering the concept less relevant compared to its three-dimensional counterpart, which forms a semisimple Lie algebra.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of skew symmetric matrices
  • Familiarity with state vector representations in physics
  • Basic knowledge of Lie algebras
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of skew symmetric matrices in various dimensions
  • Study the implications of semisimple Lie algebras in physics
  • Learn about the application of rotation matrices in state transformations
  • Explore the use of LaTeX for formatting mathematical equations in discussions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying dynamics and algebraic structures, as well as anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of state transformations in one-dimensional systems.

hoddy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
if I have a equation like (just a random eq.) p_dot = S(omega)*p. where p = [x, y, z] is the original states, omega = [p, q, r] and S - skew symmetric. How does the equation appear if i only want a system to have the state z?
Hi,

if I have a equation like (just a random eq.) p_dot = S(omega)*p. where p = [x, y, z] is the original states, omega = [p, q, r] and S - skew symmetric.
How does the equation appear if i only want a system to have the state z? do I get z_dot = -q*x + p*y. Or is the symmetric not valid so I simply get z_dot = z? or something else?
and the same for rotation matrix? : p_dot = R(omega)*p

Thanks for any replies!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hoddy said:
(just a random eq.)
You are asking us to decode a random equation that you made up?

And it would help if you would please learn to post math equations using LaTeX. That would make your postings a lot more clear (well, maybe not if you keep posting random equations...).

The PF LaTeX tutorial is available in the Help pages, under INFO at the top of the page.
 
Hi berkeman. sorry, here is the complete equation with v, omega, f and g beeing 3x1 vectors:
awd.PNG


Im just curious about the first term with the skew symmetric, how it will turn out when I only have it in 1 dimension, like described in original post.
 
What should skew symmetry mean in one dimension? S=0? I suspect from your question that we speak about quantum physics, and the three dimensional skew symmetric matrices form a semisimple Lie algebra. It's no longer semisimple in the one dimensional case which is crucial, skew symmetric or not, hence irrelevant in the context you hinted at.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K