Skiing both ways conservation of energy/1D kinematic

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a skier descending from a height and then ascending another hill, focusing on the conservation of energy and kinematics in a one-dimensional context. The discussion centers around calculating the skier's speed at various points, considering gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different equations related to kinetic and potential energy, questioning the relevance of angles and the signs of gravitational acceleration in their calculations. Some participants attempt various methods to arrive at the skier's speed at the bottom of the valley and at the top of the second hill.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the calculations, with some participants noting discrepancies in their results. Guidance is provided regarding the treatment of gravitational acceleration and its sign depending on the defined coordinate system. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly concerning the application of energy conservation principles.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the treatment of gravitational acceleration in different directions and its impact on calculations. There is also mention of potential roundoff errors affecting results.

J827
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
skiing both ways...conservation of energy/1D kinematic

Homework Statement


A skier starts from rest at the top of a 45.0-m-high hill, skis down a 30° incline into a valley, and continues up a 40.0-m-high hill. The heights of both hills are measured from the valley floor. Assume that friction is negligible and ignore the effect of the ski poles.

a. How fast is the skier moving at the bottom of the valley?

b. What is the skier’s speed at the top of the second hill?

Homework Equations


Equation A
KEi + PEi = KEf + PEf

or

Equation B
vf2 = vi2 + 2ad

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the angle is irrelevant because only gravity is affecting his movement.

I understand part a. Using Equation A, initial KE and final PE are zero. Final velocity is 30m/s. I get the same answer using Equation B. I confirmed this answer with the solution manual.

I am getting stuck on part b. Here is what I have tried so far:

Option 1a:
starting from the valley, using Equation A
Initial PE = 0, because you are in the valley.
Mass factors out of equation because is in three remaining terms.

(0.5 * 302) = (0.5 * Vf2) + (9.8 * 40)
vf = 10.8 m/s

Option 1b:
same as 1a, but using -9.8 since he's going in a different direction
vf = 41 m/s

Option 2:
starting from the valley, using Equation B
vf2 = (302) + (2 * -9.8 * 40)
vf = 10.8 m/s

Option 3a (as taken from official solution manual):
starting from the top of the first hill, using Equation A
initial KE = 0
mass factors out of equation

ghi = 0.5vf2 + ghf
(9.8*45) = (0.5vf2) + (9.8 * 40)
vf = 9.9 m/s

Option 3b
(because I don't understand why the same sign for g would be used if he is going in 2 different directions)
(9.8 * 45) = (0.5vf2) + (-9.8 * 40)
vf = 41 m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your problem is roundoff error. You did not calculate your v at the bottom of the hill correctly. It's less than 30 m/s.
 
*headdesk* :blushing: :smile:

thanks.
 
Edit: looks like I took too long thinking about why g is positive. Anyway..

I make the velocity at the bottom 29.7m/s not 30m/s. Makes all the difference.

Otherwise ..

1a and 2 and 3a are all valid approaches and all give the same answer 9.9m/s

1b and 3b are wrong.

I've not got a good explanation for why g is positive accept to say that as he climbs the other hill he clearly must gain PE.
 
J827 said:
(because I don't understand why the same sign for g would be used if he is going in 2 different directions)
It all depends on how you define the positive direction. If up is positive in both parts then g is negative in both and the vertical distance is negative in a), positive in b).
 
If I drop something it falls toward Earth. It doesn't matter if I'm going uphill or downhill.
 
while the magnitude of g never changes, how it affects your velocity will depending on how you have defined direction. if I am skiing downhill, my velocity will increase at a rate of 9.8 m/s2. As I ski uphill, however, my velocity will decrease at a rate of 9.8 m/s2.

I've not got a good explanation for why g is positive accept to say that as he climbs the other hill he clearly must gain PE.

that makes sense & explains why using when Equation A 9.8 is positive, while using Equation B 9.8 is negative.
 
rude man said:
If I drop something it falls toward Earth. It doesn't matter if I'm going uphill or downhill.
Was that in response to my post? I don't see how what I said contradicts that. It's g either way, but depending on how you define the positive direction, g is either +9.8ms-2 or -9.8ms-2.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
Was that in response to my post? I don't see how what I said contradicts that. It's g either way, but depending on how you define the positive direction, g is either +9.8ms-2 or -9.8ms-2.

I know you well enough to know that you know that the sign of g does not change once the coordinate system is defined!

No, I sensed the OP thought g was one sign going down & the other going up.
 
  • #11
No, I sensed the OP thought g was one sign going down & the other going up.

nope, I'm good. :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K