Skiing: Calculating Speed and Friction Coefficient

  • Thread starter Thread starter st3dent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slope
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a skier descending from two mountains with different elevations, focusing on calculating the skier's speed and the coefficient of friction required to reach the lower peak without using poles. The subject area includes concepts of energy conservation, friction, and kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore energy conservation principles, applying the work-energy theorem to determine the skier's speed and the necessary friction coefficient. There are attempts to derive equations relating potential and kinetic energy, as well as frictional forces.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations and reasoning regarding the energy lost during the descent and the corresponding friction force. There is acknowledgment of the correctness of certain calculations, but also ongoing questions about the implications of the results and how to derive the normal force.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the skier reaches the lower peak with zero velocity, which influences their calculations regarding energy loss and friction. There is also a focus on the relationship between forces acting on the skier and the geometry of the slope.

st3dent
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
2. Two mountains are at elevations of 850m and 750m above the valley between them. A ski run extends from the top of the higher peak to the top of the lower one, with a total length of 3.2km and an average slope of 30 degrees,
a) A skier starts from rest on the higher peak. At what speed will be arrive at the top of the lower peak if he just coasts without using poles?
b)How large a coefficient of friction would be tolerable without preventing him from reaching the lower peak?

what I've done:
2a) (m)(9.8)(850) = (m)(9.8)(750) + (0.5)(m)(vf^2)
vf^2 = 1960
vf = 44.27 m/s

b)I am stuck on this one.

Thanks in advance for your help.
 

Attachments

  • question1.jpg
    question1.jpg
    6.4 KB · Views: 641
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume that the skier just arrives at the second peak with 0 velocity. How much energy must he/she have lost? Okay, now use "energy = force*distance" to calculate the friction force necessary to account for that energy loss.
 
(a) looks right, I didn't check your calculation but the formula is correct.

As for (b), let's write down the work-energy equation:

W_{friction} = \Delta E_m = \Delta E_p + \Delta E_k

Our worst case scenario would be if the coefficient of friction would be so large, that the skier would reach the lower peak just barely - without any speed. In that case his kinetic energy would be 0 at first (since he starts from rest) and 0 at the end (since he has no speed when he reaches the peak):

W_f = (mgh_2 - mgh_1) + (0 - 0) = mg(750m - 850m) = -100mg

Now what is the work of friction? It is the force of friction times the distance, which is 3.2km or 3,200 meters. Don't forget the work is negative, though, because the force vector is directly opposite to the distance vector all the time:

-xf_k = -3200f_k = -100mg

f_k = N\mu _k = \frac{100mg}{3200} = \frac{mg}{32}

\mu _k = \frac{mg}{32N}

Now all you have to do is find the normal force, N...
 
I understand the following:

Since the change in kinetic energy is zero,
Ei = Ef
mgh1 = mgh2 + Ffrd
mgh1 - mgh2 = Ffrd
mg(750 - 850) = Ffrd

Since Ffrd = \mu _kFnd

Fnd = mg(750 - 850)
Fn = -100mg / d
Fn = -100mg/-3200
Fn = mg/32

AS;
Ek = 0.5mv2

In part a), i found the speed of the skier at the top of the second slope to be 44.27 m/s.
Then,
(m)(9.8)(850) = (m)(9.8)(750) + (0.5)(m)(v2)
(m)(9.8)(850) = (m)(9.8)(750) + (0.5)(m)(44.272)
However, i can't solve for m, since it cancels out.

I do know that the force down the slop is mgsin30 and that
Fn, the normal force, is mgcos30. But how can i use this to solve this problem?
 
Last edited:
I THINK I have a solution now.

Since Ffrd = mg / 32
and Ffr = \mu _kmgcos30

then \mu _kmgcos30 = mg/32
\mu _k = mg/32mgcos30
\mu _k = 1/32cos30
\mu _k = 0.036

Is that the right answer...THANKS!
 
Yes, 0.036.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K