Slinky springs and eq of motion.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of a mass connected to two slinky springs with different spring constants, k1 and k2. The equation of motion derived is mx'' + (k1 - k2)x = 0, indicating that the net force acting on the mass is dependent on the difference in spring constants. The key insight is that both springs exert a restoring force towards the equilibrium position when the mass is displaced, regardless of their initial lengths. This clarifies that the effective spring constant for the system is not simply the sum of k1 and k2, but rather their difference when considering the direction of forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law of motion
  • Familiarity with Hooke's law and spring constants
  • Basic knowledge of differential equations
  • Concept of equilibrium in mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equations of motion for systems with multiple springs
  • Learn about the principles of superposition in mechanical systems
  • Explore the effects of damping on oscillatory motion
  • Investigate the behavior of coupled oscillators in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of spring systems and oscillatory motion.

JoshuaR
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
A mass is resting on a horizontal surface without friction. It is connected on both sides by slinky springs k1 and k2 (that is they have different spring constants, and the equilibrium position will not be in the center of the system). First I had to find the equation of motion after setting up the forces. I've seen an example of a mass connected on either side by a spring and k=k1+k2. This is because whichever side of equilibrium you place the mass, the forces act in the same direction, one pulls and one pushes, basically. In this however, the slinky springs naturally are of length L0, or they are close to zero before stretched. Therefore both springs are pulling away from the center no matter where you set the displacement. It is just that one is pulling more than the other, being displaced further. (This is my reasoning so far.) So if I displace to the right, I say sum of forces=ma=-k1x+k2x. That is the force of k1 pulls to the left while k2 to the right. So I have mx"+(k1-k2)x=0 or x"+((k1-k2)/m)x=0. Is this right? Or should I have done (K1+k2)?

Thanks, Josh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JoshuaR said:
I've seen an example of a mass connected on either side by a spring and k=k1+k2. This is because whichever side of equilibrium you place the mass, the forces act in the same direction, one pulls and one pushes, basically.
OK.

In this however, the slinky springs naturally are of length L0, or they are close to zero before stretched. Therefore both springs are pulling away from the center no matter where you set the displacement.
Are you saying that the springs are unstretched when the mass is at equilibrium? In any case, the only thing that matters is the change in the force that each spring exerts when the mass is displaced from equilibrium.

When the mass is at the equilibrium position, the net force is always zero. The springs are either both pushing or both pulling or both exerting no force. When the mass is displaced from equilibrium, the change in force exerted by each spring is always in the same direction: towards the equilibrium position. Thus both springs contribute positively to the net restoring force.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K