Slope and deflection of beam sample problem question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on using the superposition method to determine the slope and deflection of a beam in a sample problem. The user expresses confusion regarding the multiplication of the angle in radians by the length of the straight portion of the beam, as described in their textbook. They have attempted to convert the angle into degrees and apply the sine function but did not achieve the expected results. The key takeaway is the importance of understanding the relationship between angle measures and beam deflection calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beam deflection principles
  • Familiarity with the superposition method in structural analysis
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, particularly sine
  • Basic grasp of radians and degrees conversion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the superposition method for beam deflection in-depth
  • Learn about the relationship between angle measures and beam deflection
  • Explore the application of trigonometric functions in structural engineering
  • Review case studies involving beam deflection calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying structural engineering, civil engineering professionals, and anyone involved in beam analysis and deflection calculations.

Umayer
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The sample question explains how I can use superposition to determine the slope and deflection of the beam. I have made a picture of the page. I know how to use the method as I've used it on other, much difficult problems. However, this sample problem has been stuck in my head for a quite long time. The problem starts by determining the deflection at the end of the beam. I've underlined the equation where I'm confused.

This is the sample problem.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/x025uvs253hne0f/Sample problem.jpg

I understand that by superposing the beam into two separate loadings, you can add the maximum deflection of those two in order to attain the maximum deflection of the original beam. In loading II, the beam goes straight half through so the angle is the same at the end of the beam. But in the book, they multiplied the angle with length of the part that goes straight. I have absolutely no idea why they did that. The angle is in radians and within my knowledge it made no sense to me.

Homework Equations



Case 1

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-wVZ-cJsAc...QgKKf2Q/s1600/beam+deflections+and+slopes.png

The Attempt at a Solution



I converted the angle into degrees and then used sinus on that. Then I multiplied with the length of the straight beam but that didn't really gave me the answer I hoped for. I tried to look on the internet up if there was a relation between them but I couldn't find the answer.A huge thanks to anyone who can explain to me what they did!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For small angles (in radian measure), sin(theta) is approximately equal to theta.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K