Small oscillations around equilibrium point in polynomial potential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a particle of mass m moving in a polynomial potential given by u(x) = k(x^4 - 7x^2 - 4x). The original poster is attempting to find the frequency of small oscillations around the equilibrium point, identified as x=2.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster discusses using the Lagrangian approach and the Euler–Lagrange equation to derive motion equations. They express confusion about neglecting higher-order terms in the potential when considering small oscillations. Other participants suggest approximating the potential locally as a quadratic function around the equilibrium points and question the implications of the approximation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different approaches to the problem. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of approximations for small oscillations, and the original poster has made progress in their calculations, leading to a potential expression for angular frequency.

Contextual Notes

There are two equilibrium points mentioned, but the original poster indicates a focus solely on the x=2 equilibrium point. The discussion also touches on the nature of small oscillations and the assumptions involved in approximating the potential.

roflol12
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys i am a bit confused about this problem,
a particle of mass, m, moves in potential a potential u(x)=k(x4 - 7 x2 -4x)
I need to find the frequency of small oscillations about the equilibrium point.

I have worked out that x=2 corresponds to the equilibrium point as

- dU/dx = F = -k(4x3 - 14x -4)=0 at x=2

I tried to solve using the Lagrangian with
L=1/2 m v2 -k(x4 - 7 x2 -4x)

using Euler–Lagrange equation d/dt(dL/dv)=dL/dx
to get: ma= -k(4x3 - 14x -4)
I thought about dropping the x^3 term as it would be very small with small oscillations but was confused what that left me with.

Any help appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like a good approximation.
What confused you?

We are talking about oscillations, right? If the oscillation frequency is \omega, what is the stereotypical solution that you try first?
 
The potential you gave has two equilibrium points, one at x=2 and one at x=-1.7071 .

Whenever you have an equilibrium point, you can generally approximate locally by an x2 potential.

My suggestion is therefore to construct approximate k'(x-a)2 potentials at the equilibria.

How small "small" oscillations are, depends of course on your resolution, and the value you find for the frequency of the oscillations may depend on the resolution.
 
Last edited:
The key is you can work using generalized coordinates. As espen180 points out, (x-a) is small if a is an equilibrium point. You can use the approximation (x-a) is small: not the approximation that x is small.
 
think maybe i have solved it now

i took the ma= -k(4x^3 - 14x -4)
and rewrote x=2+r for a small r to get
ma= -k(4(2+r)^3 - 14(2+r) -4)
expanded to get,
ma= -k(34 r + 24 r^2 + 4 r^3)
considering r is small, i ignored the r^3 and r^2 terms to get
a=-34k/m r
which is shm with angular frequency, w^2=34k/m

look alright?
 
Looks good. :smile:

There is still the other equilibrium point though.
 
Only interested in the x=2 equilibrium point :)
thanks all!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K