Small oscillations around equilibrium point in polynomial potential

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 4K views
roflol12
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys i am a bit confused about this problem,
a particle of mass, m, moves in potential a potential u(x)=k(x4 - 7 x2 -4x)
I need to find the frequency of small oscillations about the equilibrium point.

I have worked out that x=2 corresponds to the equilibrium point as

- dU/dx = F = -k(4x3 - 14x -4)=0 at x=2

I tried to solve using the Lagrangian with
L=1/2 m v2 -k(x4 - 7 x2 -4x)

using Euler–Lagrange equation d/dt(dL/dv)=dL/dx
to get: ma= -k(4x3 - 14x -4)
I thought about dropping the x^3 term as it would be very small with small oscillations but was confused what that left me with.

Any help appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like a good approximation.
What confused you?

We are talking about oscillations, right? If the oscillation frequency is [itex]\omega[/itex], what is the stereotypical solution that you try first?
 
The potential you gave has two equilibrium points, one at x=2 and one at x=-1.7071 .

Whenever you have an equilibrium point, you can generally approximate locally by an x2 potential.

My suggestion is therefore to construct approximate k'(x-a)2 potentials at the equilibria.

How small "small" oscillations are, depends of course on your resolution, and the value you find for the frequency of the oscillations may depend on the resolution.
 
Last edited:
think maybe i have solved it now

i took the ma= -k(4x^3 - 14x -4)
and rewrote x=2+r for a small r to get
ma= -k(4(2+r)^3 - 14(2+r) -4)
expanded to get,
ma= -k(34 r + 24 r^2 + 4 r^3)
considering r is small, i ignored the r^3 and r^2 terms to get
a=-34k/m r
which is shm with angular frequency, w^2=34k/m

look alright?
 
Looks good. :smile:

There is still the other equilibrium point though.
 
Only interested in the x=2 equilibrium point :)
thanks all!