Snog, Marry, Avoid: Male Makeover in UK Reality Show

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strange
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the UK reality show "Snog, Marry, Avoid," which features individuals with unconventional fashion choices undergoing makeovers to appear more "normal." Participants often revert to their original styles post-makeover, raising questions about personal expression versus societal acceptance. The conversation highlights varying opinions on flamboyant fashion, with some participants expressing admiration for the confidence of those who dress unconventionally, while others criticize such styles as foolish or attention-seeking. The term "snog" is clarified as meaning "kiss," prompting further exploration of cultural differences in fashion and self-expression. The dialogue touches on deeper themes of conformity, individuality, and the societal pressures surrounding appearance, with some arguing that the desire to dress differently should not be ridiculed, while others maintain that certain styles can be perceived as inappropriate or silly. The conversation reflects a broader debate about identity, acceptance, and the subjective nature of fashion.
  • #31
DaveC426913 said:
Frankly, I find this far, far more attractive and interesting to look at than the current fashions over here of young men with their baseball caps, hoodies, poop-hanger pants and undies hanging out. It must be hellish to be a young woman trying to find an attractive guy in this day and age.

Around here the big thing for the white kids now are the too tight hip hugger jeans that always look a size too small.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
TheStatutoryApe said:
Around here the big thing for the white kids now are the too tight hip hugger jeans that always look a size too small.

I've seen black kids wearing it too. They're typically between 16 and 20.
 
  • #33
Evo said:
In the UK they have a reality show where they pick real people that dress as freaks and show them what they would look like as normal human beings. It's called snog, marry, avoid.

Here is a link to one of the "make overs". I can't believe this person actually dressed like that. Believe it or not, he did go back to his old ways after his "clean up".

That's a male, btw.




If you think about it. Those people are constanting being stare at, and made a joke to anyone standing next to them. It does take a lot of inner character to dress the way they do. They are very confident people.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
I find the notion that that guy needed to be "fixed" INCREDIBLY offensive. That guy was a billion times more interesting in the before then the stupid chump he became in the after. "Fitting in" is for the mediocre. Express yourself, the most important humans in existence have been downright weird by mundane standard. If a polo shirt and khaki's seem like home to you then wear the **** out of it, if they don't and someone tries to make you feel bad about yourself because you're not wearing what doesn't speak to you then give them a firm punch in the face. They'll think twice before doing that again. It never ceases to amaze me how people can make these simple minded judgements. What empirical or scientific basis do you have to say that guy's life was improved by dressing like a douche. There are noteworthy people who set the fashion of the time, those who oppose it, those who don't give a damn and those who just fall in line. Which one are you?
 
  • #35
Ultimately, to me, this smells of just another attempt of the old to trivialize the young. A useless endeavour at best. (a disasterous one at the worst)
 
  • #36
vectorcube said:
If you think about it. Those people are constanting being stare at, and made a joke to anyone standing next to them. It does take a lot of inner character to dress the way they do. They are very confident people.
Wellll...

that's what they would have you believe, yes.

A lot of people (dare I say most) who dress flamboyantly do so to hide their inner insecurities. The rationale is: I don't want you to stare at the real me, so I will put on a garish suit of armour. Now you are not staring at me, you're staring at my mask. I can live with that because I am in control of it.
 
  • #37
DaveC426913 said:
Wellll...

that's what they would have you believe, yes.

A lot of people (dare I say most) who dress flamboyantly do so to hide their inner insecurities. The rationale is: I don't want you to stare at the real me, so I will put on a garish suit of armour. Now you are not staring at me, you're staring at my mask. I can live with that because I am in control of it.



Makes a lot of sense.
 
  • #38
If he truly likes dressing that way and arrived at that style because it suits him (and not because he saw this ), then I agree with you maverick. But all too often people dress in "shocking" ways to try to make a statement. But making a statement with actions or words takes effort, and doing it with clothes is easy, yet ineffective against all but the old and monocled.

It's like, "Hey, your fascination with what people are wearing is stupid. Clothes don't matter...now look at my wacky clothes! I'm original. Please tell me I'm original".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #39
Tobias Funke said:
If he truly likes dressing that way and arrived at that style because it suits him (and not because he saw this ), then I agree with you maverick. But all too often people dress in "shocking" ways to try to make a statement. But making a statement with actions or words takes effort, and doing it with clothes is easy, yet ineffective against all but the old and monocled.

It's like, "Hey, your fascination with what people are wearing is stupid. Clothes don't matter...now look at my wacky clothes! I'm original. Please tell me I'm original".


And people who dress without any flair aren't trying to make a statement? I've never understood why people value normalcy so much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #40
Evo said:
people are strange

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awi14wDTxNw
 
  • #41
George Jones said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awi14wDTxNw

Ya, I know. that's the first thing I thought when I saw the thread title :). Jim Morrison, dressed pretty funky (for the 60's).
 
  • #42
maverick_starstrider said:
And people who dress without any flair aren't trying to make a statement?

Whether they are or aren't, part of my point is that if you have to rely on clothes to make your statements for you, then that says something about you. I know nothing about the guy in the video so I can't comment on him specifically, but if you think that everyone who dresses differently does so because it's their style then I'd have to disagree.

People, or at least me, aren't making fun of guy's clothes as much as the good possibility that he's only wearing them to be different.

For the record, I don't like "normal" dress either in most situations. My principal told me I need to dress "above the students" because my clothes consist of button down shirts with sleeves rolled up, slacks, and basketball sneakers. Apparently a tie and nice (ie uncomfortable) shoes will allow me to take my place above the lowly student peasants.
 
  • #43
Tobias Funke said:
Whether they are or aren't, part of my point is that if you have to rely on clothes to make your statements for you, then that says something about you. I know nothing about the guy in the video so I can't comment on him specifically, but if you think that everyone who dresses differently does so because it's their style then I'd have to disagree.

People, or at least me, aren't making fun of guy's clothes as much as the good possibility that he's only wearing them to be different.

For the record, I don't like "normal" dress either in most situations. My principal told me I need to dress "above the students" because my clothes consist of button down shirts with sleeves rolled up, slacks, and basketball sneakers. Apparently a tie and nice (ie uncomfortable) shoes will allow me to take my place above the lowly student peasants.


Yes but is the desire to be different (even in an, ironically, normal and predictable way) a negative trait worthy of ridicule? It is human nature to try and clamp down on those who seek to deviate and a lot of people think this kind of flippant ostricizing of the abnormal, whether it be wild fashions, unusual habits, "nerdiness", independent thinking, etc. is innocent. However, I tend to see it as anything but innocent. The status quo depends on non-boat rockers but CHANGE depends on deviation. So if, anything, IMHO one could lambast this guy for a LAME attempt at deviation, not the desire to deviate. Failed independent thinking is far more virtuous then no attempt at all. Whether it is motivated by insecurity is entirely irrelevant. The desire to conform is equally driven by insecurity, and any "great" person who has had a profound effect on the world was driven by insecurity of one form of the other; selfish chip on your shoulder, desire to show up others, revenge, etc. That stuffs is the fuel of a different future.
 
  • #44
maverick_starstrider said:
Yes but is the desire to be different (even in an, ironically, normal and predictable way) a negative trait worthy of ridicule?

When I was 12 or 13, I watched a skate video and a skater was talking about all their different styles. One was the hippie, one was the grunge skater, one was the guy with his hair styled like horns, etc. So I decided that my style would be to wear mismatched socks when skating. I quickly realized that this was silly not because it was different, but because it was a conscious attempt to be different in a meaningless way.

But anyway, I don't want to make a whole big thing out of this because I mostly agree with you. I do think it's stupid to ridicule people for dressing differently, but I also think that most people who dress that way never got past their superficial mismatched sock phase. I mean, there's independent thinking, and then there's bathing in fake tan spray. Neither deserves ridicule, but I think there's a difference.
 
  • #45
Tobias Funke said:
When I was 12 or 13, I watched a skate video and a skater was talking about all their different styles. One was the hippie, one was the grunge skater, one was the guy with his hair styled like horns, etc. So I decided that my style would be to wear mismatched socks when skating. I quickly realized that this was silly not because it was different, but because it was a conscious attempt to be different in a meaningless way.

But anyway, I don't want to make a whole big thing out of this because I mostly agree with you. I do think it's stupid to ridicule people for dressing differently, but I also think that most people who dress that way never got past their superficial mismatched sock phase. I mean, there's independent thinking, and then there's bathing in fake tan spray. Neither deserves ridicule, but I think there's a difference.

I'll agree to agree to that.
 
  • #46
maverick_starstrider said:
Ultimately, to me, this smells of just another attempt of the old to trivialize the young. A useless endeavour at best. (a disasterous one at the worst)

eh? that guy loved being the center of attention. in fact, it's not the first time I've seen him.
 
  • #47
maverick_starstrider said:
There are noteworthy people who set the fashion of the time, those who oppose it, those who don't give a damn and those who just fall in line. Which one are you?

:smile: What a cliche rant against "the establishment". It sounds like a really bad advertisement.It's like people who buy apple computers to be "different" and not follow the crowd, when in reality they are all the same and follow each other "not following main stream".
 
  • #48
See the derision of Proton Soup and Cyrus is exactly my point. It is clearly originating from the thought that you think they think they're better than you. So you clamp down on it and ridicule it (How dare they with there stupid clothes, freaks!). To me this attitude is justs loosely veiled philistinism and only a hop skip and a jump away from the sort of "get the queer" mob mentality you still see kicking around. Or the idiotic notion that someone has a "problem" with their gender identity (it's you who has the problem, not them).
 
  • #49
Hey, it's a free society: you can dress however you like. But I can also label him as looking like a damn fool (which he does look like).

There is a time and a place to dress like that. Every day in public is not one.
 
  • #50
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="[URL]http://www.youtube.com/v/Fy6iJGqRA48&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Fy6iJGqRA48&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]

*waves lighter in the air*. Rock on little orange, pink hot pants dude.

Cyrus said:
Hey, it's a free society: you can dress however you like. But I can also label him as looking like a damn fool (which he does look like).

There is a time and a place to dress like that. Every day in public is not one.

What would be your prescribed dress code for daily wear herr fuhrer?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #51
maverick_starstrider said:
See the derision of Proton Soup and Cyrus is exactly my point. It is clearly originating from the thought that you think they think they're better than you. So you clamp down on it and ridicule it (How dare they with there stupid clothes, freaks!). To me this attitude is justs loosely veiled philistinism and only a hop skip and a jump away from the sort of "get the queer" mob mentality you still see kicking around. Or the idiotic notion that someone has a "problem" with their gender identity (it's you who has the problem, not them).

lol, it is true that i do find some amusement here. so what? it seems to make him happy and it's no skin off my nose. maybe he can even make a career out of it. good for him.

however, i do not think they think they're better than me. nor do i understand what makes you think that. I've never been one to "get the queer", either. if anything, i was more on the other side growing up as an underweight "band fag" who didn't get into team sports and studied way too much.

i think you're just humourless. the guy's fashion sense is gawdy, even for a gay man, but that is part of his schtick, i think.
 
  • #52
maverick_starstrider said:
What would be your prescribed dress code for daily wear herr fuhrer?

http://germanmilitariacollectibles.com/blog/uploaded_images/img128-735172.jpg

northKoreaImage1.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #53
Cyrus said:
There is a time and a place to dress like that. Every day in public is not one.
Why?
 
  • #54
DaveC426913 said:
Why?

You want to play again Dave? :devil:

There is something called social norms. But, he does look like a fool in his white booty shorts and pink shoes with bright makeup. You can snog him if you like though. I won't tell.
 
  • #55
DaveC426913 said:
Why?
Because someone might choke to death laughing while trying to swallow their food? I can imagine him walking into a restaurant...
 
  • #56
DaveC426913 said:
Why?

Because he looks like a freak?

[didn't my dad say that about long hair?]
 
  • #57
I can't imagine how an intelligent person could use a term like freak with any seriousness. This is a physics board for christ's-sake. I don't know if you were informed but the general public has some pretty negative stereotypes about you. Awfully nice of you to play along though.
 
  • #58
maverick_starstrider said:
I can't imagine how an intelligent person could use a term like freak with any seriousness. This is a physics board for christ's-sake. I don't know if you were informed but the general public has some pretty negative stereotypes about you. Awfully nice of you to play along though.

Life is full of surprises. Welcome to the real world. You're so open minded your let your brain fall out in the process. :wink:

In the meanwhile, I'll say what I think: he looks like a fool. He might be a nice kid, but he looks like an idiot.
 
  • #59
Cyrus said:
Life is full of surprises. Welcome to the real world. You're so open minded your let your brain fall out in the process. :wink:

In the meanwhile, I'll say what I think: he looks like a fool. He might be a nice kid, but he looks like an idiot.

Yes but I'd like to hear your justification of this as anything other then asinine prejudice.
 
  • #60
maverick_starstrider said:
I can't imagine how an intelligent person could use a term like freak with any seriousness. This is a physics board for christ's-sake. I don't know if you were informed but the general public has some pretty negative stereotypes about you. Awfully nice of you to play along though.
It depends on your use of the word freak. Ivan and I are roughly the same age. When I was in my teens, we called ourselves freaks. It meant we were non-conformists. It meant we didn't fit into normal society, "outside of socially acceptable norms' would be a good definition. We did not expect to be accepted. As I am sure that this kid does not expect to be accepted as normal. Some people want to shock people. They want to be considered "freaks".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K