Snooker/billiard/Newton's balls

  • Thread starter Thread starter whoeli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the mechanics of energy transfer in billiard balls, specifically when one ball strikes another in a sequence, similar to a Newton's cradle. It raises questions about how energy propagates through a line of balls and the potential for this effect to scale with more balls. The speed of energy transfer is linked to the speed of sound in the material of the balls, influenced by their stiffness and deformation during collisions. The conversation also hints at the theoretical implications of using a large number of balls to observe this phenomenon. Understanding these dynamics could provide insights into both snooker and broader physics principles.
whoeli
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I just joined so I could ask a question on something about which I've been curious for quite a while.

Imagine a shot in snooker whereby the white ball hits a red, and that red was already touching another red. The result of the shot is that that second red gets fired away like a ball on a Newton's cradle.

Now you can put more balls into the shot and, provided they're all stuck together, the ball at the end of the line will be fired away like the end ball in a Newton's cradle.

My question is quite an open one. Given a big enough billiard table and enough balls, I could, I assume, make a line of, say, 100 balls and get the same effect. 1000 balls, even? A million balls? The main part of my question I'm interested in is this: How fast does the energy pass through the balls?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
whoeli said:
How fast does the energy pass through the balls?
Forces are transmitted through the balls at the speed of sound in the balls. There is also a stiffness factor (how much the balls deform versus compressive force), that determines the duration of the collisions. Link to a web page with info on Newton's cradle:

http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/scenario/cradle.htm
 
Thanks so much. :) I appreciate it.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top