Socks in the Dryer: Benjamin Franklin's Positive-Negative Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Benjamin Franklin's positive-negative theory as it relates to static electricity generated by various sock materials in a dryer. Wool is classified as positive, while black polypropylene is negative, leading to the phenomenon of socks sticking together. The conversation also touches on the concept of static reactivity, with materials like glass and leather exhibiting varying levels of static charge. Additionally, the participants humorously speculate about the existence of a "black hole" in dryers that causes socks to disappear, referencing related threads on the topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static electricity and its principles
  • Familiarity with Benjamin Franklin's theories on charge
  • Knowledge of materials' triboelectric properties
  • Basic concepts of neutron scattering and its relevance to static charge
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the triboelectric series and its implications for material interactions
  • Explore the concept of static reactivity in different materials
  • Investigate the role of cotton as a moderator in static electricity
  • Examine the health implications of static charge on human skin
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, material scientists, and anyone interested in the principles of static electricity and its everyday implications, particularly in household settings like laundry.

Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,757
Reaction score
3,033
In the dryer were one pair wool socks, one pair black polypropylene, and a dozen or so cotton socks. Each white wool sock was stuck to one black polypro sock. Each pair was folded onto one another in a sort of coil.

Benjamin Franklin defined wool as positive, so polypro is negative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jerromyjon
Physics news on Phys.org
Hornbein said:
Benjamin Franklin defined wool as positive, so polypro is negative.
I've seen a chart of sorts for levels of "static reactivity" or whatever its called but the further apart on the list the more static "power" they have. I think it has like glass, leather, wool, etc.
 
I am fairly certain that a black hole exists in everyone's dryer that occasionally sucks up just ONE sock and dumps it out onto some random highway somewhere along the west coast of the USA. I've seen so many single socks along so many highways just laying there all lost and forlorn. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jerromyjon, Borek and Sophia
I'm sure it has been called before now' non-conservation of parity'.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jerromyjon and zoobyshoe
jerromyjon said:
I've seen a chart of sorts for levels of "static reactivity" or whatever its called but the further apart on the list the more static "power" they have. I think it has like glass, leather, wool, etc.

Looking up static reactivity there was something about neutron scattering. Maybe the cotton socks acted as a moderator.

Another list seemed to say that human skin had more tendency to become positively charged than anything else except air. Maybe there really is something to the health aspect of it. Neutral materials like cotton are quite rare. The most negative is silicon rubber.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jerromyjon
Hornbein said:
... The most negative is silicon rubber.
No, it's ebonite that is found most negatively charged in an triboeletric effect. Silicon rubber is only ranked second from the bottom.:biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jerromyjon
Hornbein said:
Maybe the cotton socks acted as a moderator.
Or a catalyst, like a spin-foam twist inducer..
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Silicon Waffle

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K