Solution to quadratic equation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 3K views
paulmdrdo
Messages
89
Reaction score
2
Q48_49hall_XXVIC.jpg
1. Homework Statement

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I just want some clarification about the rules on solving quadratic equation. My question is coming from my solution for problem 49.

Solving problem 49 [/B]
Factor: (x−p−q)(√(x−q)+√(x−p))=0
Therefore: x−p−q=0⇒x=p+q this agrees with the answer in my book

What I am confused about is the part where I divided out the lhs by (√(x−q)+√(x−p)). This factor contains x in it and I'm worried that I may have discarded the other root for the equation. And since it is a quadratic equation I am expecting to get two roots for the equation. Can you enlighten me about this matter? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
paulmdrdo said:
Q48_49hall_XXVIC.jpg
1. Homework Statement

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I just want some clarification about the rules on solving quadratic equation. My question is coming from my solution for problem 49.

Solving problem 49 [/B]
Factor: (x−p−q)(√(x−q)+√(x−p))=0
Therefore: x−p−q=0⇒x=p+q this agrees with the answer in my book

What I am confused about is the part where I divided out the lhs by (√(x−q)+√(x−p)). This factor contains x in it and I'm worried that I may have discarded the other root for the equation. And since it is a quadratic equation I am expecting to get two roots for the equation. Can you enlighten me about this matter? Thanks.
When you solve an equation of form f(x) g(x) =0, you use the fact that the product is zero if either f(x)=0 or g(x)=0. In principle, it is possible that √(x−q)+√(x−p) = 0. What does it mean for √(x−q) and √(x−p)?
You started the solution by multiplying the whole equation with √(x−q)√(x−p). What is the condition that you may do it?
 
The one and only posibility that √(x−q)+√(x−p) =0 is if x=p=q. Therefore x=q=p is also a solution? I am still confused. Please bear with me.
 
paulmdrdo said:
The one and only posibility that √(x−q)+√(x−p) =0 is if x=p=q. Therefore x=q=p is also a solution? I am still confused. Please bear with me.

You are not allowed to have either ##x = p## or ##x = q##, because the right-hand-side of your original equation would then contain division by zero, which is absolutely forbidden.
 
Ray Vickson said:
You are not allowed to have either ##x = p## or ##x = q##, because the right-hand-side of your original equation would then contain division by zero, which is absolutely forbidden.

What? When x = x+p we will also have division by zero right? Why is it that √(x-q)+√(x-p) is not allowed to be equal zero but x-p-q can be equal zero?
 
paulmdrdo said:
What? When x = x+p we will also have division by zero right? Why is it that √(x-q)+√(x-p) is not allowed to be equal zero but x-p-q can be equal zero?
The following doesn't make sense unless p = 0 .
paulmdrdo said:
When x = x+p
 
Suggestion: Group the sqrt (x-p ) terms on one side of the equation (one term will be in the denominator), and the sqrt(x-q) terms on the other side of the equation and square both sides of the equation. You can then do some additional algebra. It's then a couple more steps, but you do get a quadratic expression for x in terms of p and q. The quadratic expression does factor and simplify and it does have a simple solution.
 
Last edited:
paulmdrdo said:
The one and only posibility that √(x−q)+√(x−p) =0 is if x=p=q. Therefore x=q=p is also a solution? I am still confused. Please bear with me.
You started the solution with multiplying the whole equation by √(x−q)*√(x−p). Before multiplying an equation with an expression you have to exclude that it is zero.
 
paulmdrdo said:
What? When x = x+p we will also have division by zero right? Why is it that √(x-q)+√(x-p) is not allowed to be equal zero but x-p-q can be equal zero?

Please read responses carefully: I said "... original equation...". In your original equation you had
[tex]\text{original right-hand-side} = \frac{q}{\sqrt{x-p}} + \frac{p}{\sqrt{x-q}}[/tex]
If you take ##x = p## or ##x = q## you will have ##1/\sqrt{0}## on the right, and that is forbidden.

Of course, after you multiply your equation by ##\sqrt{x-p} \sqrt{x-q}## you would have
[tex]\text{new right-hand-side} =q \sqrt{x-q} + p \sqrt{x-p}[/tex]
and in that new rhs you are certainly allowed to have ##x = p## or ##x = q##. However, that would not be giving you a solution to the original equation.
 
Last edited:
Ray Vickson said:
Please read responses carefully: I said "... original equation...". In your original equation you had
[tex]\text{original right-hand-side} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{x-p}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{x-q}}[/tex]
If you take ##x = p## or ##x = q## you will have ##1/\sqrt{0}## on the right, and that is forbidden.

Of course, after you multiply your equation by ##\sqrt{x-p} \sqrt{x-q}## you would have
[tex]\text{new right-hand-side} = \sqrt{x-q} + \sqrt{x-p}[/tex]
and in that new rhs you are certainly allowed to have ##x = p## or ##x = q##. However, that would not be giving you a solution to the original equation.
Thank you now it is clear!