Solutions to Field Equations with Einstein Tensor = 1

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the solutions to the field equations in general relativity, specifically focusing on cases where the Einstein Tensor equals 1. Participants explore the implications for the stress-energy tensor and the dimensional analysis of various components involved in the equations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if the Einstein Tensor components are set to 1, the corresponding stress-energy tensor can be expressed as T = 1 / 8 pi G.
  • Another participant questions the introduction of Planck time in the context of stress-energy tensor components, suggesting that the units may be acceptable without it.
  • A third participant provides a dimensional analysis of the metric tensor and curvature tensors, asserting that the stress-energy tensor has dimensions of energy density and discussing the dimensions of the gravitational constant G/c^4.
  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the use of "natural units" and its impact on their understanding of the equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of including Planck time in the calculations, indicating a lack of consensus on this aspect. The discussion includes multiple competing interpretations of the dimensional analysis and the implications of the Einstein equations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the appropriateness of using Planck time in the context of stress-energy tensor calculations. Additionally, the discussion highlights the dependence on the choice of units and the implications for dimensional consistency in the equations.

edgepflow
Messages
688
Reaction score
1
Suppose there is a solution to the field equations with the Einstein Tensor = 1:

Gtt = 1

and/or,

Gxx = Gyy = Gzz = 1

This would leave for the stress energy tensor:

T = 1 / 8 pi G

Now for stress, it seems to get physical units of pressure, you would apply:

Txx = Tyy = Tzz = c^2 / 8 pi G tp^2

where tp is the Planck time.

And for the time component:

Ttt = 1 / 8 pi G tp^2

Please let me know if I have these conversions straight.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
edgepflow said:
Suppose there is a solution to the field equations with the Einstein Tensor = 1:

Gtt = 1

and/or,

Gxx = Gyy = Gzz = 1

This would leave for the stress energy tensor:

T = 1 / 8 pi G

Now for stress, it seems to get physical units of pressure, you would apply:

Txx = Tyy = Tzz = c^2 / 8 pi G tp^2

where tp is the Planck time.

And for the time component:

Ttt = 1 / 8 pi G tp^2

Please let me know if I have these conversions straight.

The Gravity field equations are

[tex]G_{ab}=R_{ab}-\frac{1}{2}g_{ab}R=\frac{8\pi G}{c^4}T_{ab}[/tex]

I'm not sure why the plank time worked it's way in there. The units are fine the way they are. Maybe I'm not getting something though.
 
- The metric tensor gμν is dimensionless.
- The curvature tensors Rμν, Gμν and Rμνστ are second derivatives of the metric and have dimension L-2. (This is assuming your coordinates have dimension L. If you use polar coordinates or something like that, the dimension of those components will be different.)
- The stress-energy tensor Tμν has dimensions of energy density, which is M(L/T)2/L3 = ML-1T-2.
(Pressure has the same dimensions as energy density: force/area = M(LT-2)/L2 = ML-1T-2.)
Like jfy4 says, Einstein's Equations are Gμν = (8πG/c4) Tμν. What are the dimensions of that constant G/c4?
Well the Schwarzschild radius is 2 Gm/c2 ~ L, so G/c4 ~ M-1L-1T2, and with that I'll leave you to verify that the dimensions on both sides agree.
 
Thank you for the replies. I think the "natural units" were messing me up.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 186 ·
7
Replies
186
Views
13K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K