Solve 2-Body Equation for t w/ Given Parameters

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philosophaie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulas
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a 2-body equation in Cartesian coordinates while applying Newtonian physics principles. The equations provided describe the motion of two bodies under gravitational influence, with variables for position and velocity. A participant questions the correctness of the equations and seeks clarification on what system is being modeled. There is skepticism regarding the validity of the equations, suggesting they may not accurately represent the intended scenario. The need for a clearer context and purpose for the equations is emphasized to facilitate proper analysis.
Philosophaie
Messages
456
Reaction score
0
For a 2 Body Equation:

x = - \frac{1}{2} \frac{GM}{r^2}cos(\theta) cos(\phi) t^2 +v_x t + x_0
y= - \frac{1}{2} \frac{GM}{r^2} sin(\theta) cos(\phi) t^2 +v_y t + y_0
z= - \frac{1}{2} \frac{GM}{r^2} sin(\phi) t^2 +v_z t + z_0


r= sqrt(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)
\theta = atan(\frac{y}{x})
\phi = acos(\frac{z}{r})

Given:v_x, v_y, v_z, x_0, y_0, z_0 and M.

Now all I have to solve for t.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I see a bunch of formulas. What do they represent?
 
I am working in Cartesian Coordinates. I want to solve for x, y, z and t. I want to do this in Newtonian Physics.

For the fourth equation in the four equations and four unknowns I choose the geodesic:

(\frac{dx}{dt})^2 + (\frac{dy}{dt})^2 + (\frac{dz}{dt})^2 = 0

Are the geodesic, the x equation, the y equation, and the z equation (above) correct?
 
Last edited:
I am working in Cartesian Coordinates. I want to solve for x, y, z and t. I want to do this in Newtonian Physics.
You want to solve for x,y,z, and t, for what?

Are the geodesic, the x equation, the y equation, and the z equation (above) correct?
It is not possible to tell since you won't tell us what these equations are supposed to represent. What system are you attempting to model?

I suspect that the equations are not correct.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
860
Back
Top