Solve 5√x ≥ 625 Exponential Inequality

  • Thread starter Thread starter enibaraliu
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the exponential inequality 5√x ≥ 625, with participants exploring various methods and interpretations related to the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different approaches, including raising both sides to a power, using logarithms, and considering graphical methods. Some express uncertainty about the necessity of logarithms, while others question the validity of certain steps in the reasoning.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants offering insights and questioning each other's reasoning. There is no clear consensus on the best approach, and some participants suggest that logarithms are essential for finding an exact solution.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note constraints regarding the use of logarithms and the implications of the problem's setup, while others mention the potential for approximate solutions using graphing calculators.

enibaraliu
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I tried to solve this exponential inequation , but i can't do more:

5\sqrt[x]{64} \geq 625

5*26/x>=625 dived by 5
26/x>=125
26/x>=53 and i have not idea what to do then
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Raise both sides to the x/6 power and obtain 2 >= 5^(3x/6). Then simplify and obtain
2 >= 5^(x/2)

From there the steps no longer seem clear unless you know how to use rules of logarithms. Using base 2 or base 5 appear to offer no advantage, so take logarithms of both sides, base 10. (or base e if you prefer).
 
Last edited:
but the answer sad that the result is:xE (0,3),so this don't need logarithms
 
Some of that solution is wrong. x cannot reasonably be too close to 3. Did you try using logarithms and resorting to a graphing calculator? x should be small, maybe very small. Anybody else? I might check more thoroughly, later.
 
I believe easiest to start from here,
2^(6/x) >= 125
and take logarithms by any base of both sides.
 
There is no way I know of to get an exact answer for x without using logarithms. You can plug into a graphing calculator to get an approximate answer, but why not use logarithms?
 
Tedjn said:
There is no way I know of to get an exact answer for x without using logarithms. You can plug into a graphing calculator to get an approximate answer, but why not use logarithms?

I in fact solved the problem without using a graphing calculator; I also then posted the solution process but doing so was a violation of the rules of this forum so that post was deleted. Knowing about logarithms is truly necessary.
 
27= 128 so you must have 6/x slightly less than 7. that means that x is slightly less than 7/6, or close to 1.
I don't know what you meant by "but the answer said that the result is:xE (0,3),so this don't need logarithms " since many numbers in that interval can only be written as logarithms!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K